jedhead
New Member
Autozone too.
Bob
Bob
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
K-Dawg said:I think you need to learn how to use your brakes better. Next, I've heard several people say that there's a big difference between the PBRs on a 13" rotor and on a 11.6" rotor. Step up to the 13". I doubt that you'll be outdriving them.
It doesn't matter what size tires you chose if you buy crappy tires. Some of the fastest SHOs out there only run a 225 section width tire.
drivinhard said:Also re: above, i would NOT run 13" brakes on a track under those 16x7" PR2
somedude_001 said:I know 13" cobras fit but i'm not a big fan of them because of their small swept area.
somedude_001 said:honestly I don't think the 11.6 cobras are much more powerfull then my stock calapers (had motorcraft pads). + I warped the living crap out of my rotors and they only have 5K on them.
TYSHO said:That's because Hawk pads SUCK ASS. I don't know how many times I've said that, but I've seen Hawk pads spark like **** on a stock SHO with stock brakes...the suck and can't even stop a SHO from 140.
Want some good pads? Go with PFC and get the Z-rated ones, those guys make some bad ass brake kits and their pads are great!
yamahaSHO said:With the old rotors, I would throw sparks, but sparks aren't a bad thing. You're grinding metals together.
Maybe it was the rotors. I can't remember if they were new or not and if they were still completely smooth without grooves. Anyhow, it left me with a bad taste for the Hawks.i second that commentshomesomesho said:They are FREAKIN' AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!
I won't be autocrossing them until the season resumes in January, but so far the grip is phenomenal in the dry. Pretty good in the wet. Very stiff sidewalls makes the steering ULTRA-responsive. It is very easy to see why they have a reputation for being the #1 street-class autocross tire. Definitely give them a try.
They blow away the Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3's I used to run on the street.
The only time I had a problem is when I had a crappy rotor. With good rotors, I tracked these pads without any problems.
With the old rotors, I would throw sparks, but sparks aren't a bad thing. You're grinding metals together.
A good, cheap route is Napa Gold for about $30/rotor. I've used these and they held up great on track. A more expensive route is Eradispeed. I've done both, but I haven't tested out the 2-piece rotors yet.somedude_001 said:well that may be part of my problem. when I have my stock calapers with motorcraft rotors and pads I loved them, but now i'm running cobras on cheap rotors. i'll try upgrading the rotors to something stronger and see if that helps the situation any. I never did warp my old rotors but the cracking was starting to make the brakes click and pop under hard braking so I tossed them. the pads were also chipped, cracked, and separated to a dangerous level so they were tossed with the rotors.
i'll try different rotors and/or I will upgrade to 13" at the same time. I really apreciate the input.
yamahaSHO said:A good, cheap route is Napa Gold for about $30/rotor. I've used these and they held up great on track. A more expensive route is Eradispeed. I've done both, but I haven't tested out the 2-piece rotors yet.
Maybe they have raised their prices over the last year. IIRC, I paid around $35 a rotor. I've tracked them once and now Scott (w/ the remote-turbo SHO) has them.shomesomesho said:What part number is the Napa Gold rotor? On their website they have UP 86844 for $53.99. Is that the same one?
yamahaSHO said:Cobra's actually have a very large, wide swept area. The pad isn't tall, but a wider pad is much better than a taller pad, especially since most of the force should be focused where you're going to get the most leverage (the outer edge). MANY companies, like Wilwood, have long (wide) skinny pads because of this. The problem you have is the 11.6" x 1" rotor. It doesn't handle much heat and there's not as much leverage as a 13" x 1.1" rotor.
Ummm.... Okay... You pretty much described what I said in a much longer statement. Although, I don't think Todd agreed with you last time on the "The rule of thumb is that 75% of the braking is done with the outer most 10% of the braking surface."SHO Dude said:Ish...
Remember that every brake's job is to generate negative torque. The engine and powertrain makes positive torque to push the car along, but the brakes generate negative torque to pull you back and slow you down.
Swept area is a major factor in the braking system and is the amount of surface area of the rotor that actually touches the pad. But swept area is far less significant that Torque Arm. Torque arm is the distance from the center of the axle to the center of the pad. The longer the torque arm, the more negative torque the brake can develop. For example, lets take our ORIGINAL 12" BRAKE UPGRADE and compare it to the 13" Cobra conversion. The 12" brake has a comparable swept area to the 13" setup (I don't know what the numbers are but they are comparable for this exercise). The 12" brake has wide, tall pads while the cobra pads are shorter. The difference being the Cobra brake is much larger in dia., so the torque arm is much longer. This makes the 13" brake much better.
The rule of thumb is that 75% of the braking is done with the outer most 10% of the braking surface.
So a bigger rotor is much more desirable than a smaller rotor. The rest of the brake composition is pad compound, swept area per ton, rotor mass and rotational weight, each with it's benefits to the system as a whole.
78% percent of stats are made up on the spot, and 38% of people know that.SHO Dude said:The rule of thumb is that 75% of the braking is done with the outer most 10% of the braking surface.