Valentine 1 :INCREDIBLE:

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Status
Not open for further replies.

NotSoSlowSHO

Gas is $$ WALK!
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
5,103
Reaction score
420
Location
Moscow, IDASHO!
MilTownSHO said:
Calm down, its just a friendly discussion, or should be.

I'm more than happy with my RX-65, its better than the V1 and cheaper. V1 used to be the top dog, not anymore, they are falling behind.

I've done lots of research and testing myself.

Sorry Kenny...

Calm yourself down. And you should probably keep your CLAIMS to yourself. That is really all they are.

I suppose your "research" came in part from radartest.com, as many of your posts are nearly copied word for word from their latest reviews. BTW, you might want to lok into where radartests.com gets their funding ;)

And please do tell us about all of this "testing" of yours. This testing must be fool-proof, for you to come out and state that your Bell is without a doubt, superior to the V1.

Im not saying that the Bell isnt a nice unit. Im sure it is. But the V1 is tried and true, is always offering updates, and is just $70 more than your beloved Bell. And the Bell doesnt even offer a rear mounted sensor. The arrows alone make the V1 one worth every penny in my book.


SORRY!
 

MilTownSHO

SHO Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
Messages
6,116
Reaction score
86
Location
Horicon, WI
NotSoSlowSHO said:
Calm yourself down. And you should probably keep your CLAIMS to yourself. That is really all they are.

Can you explain to me if your V1 is SO wonderful why you jump down everyone’s throat that challenges it. Little insecure are we?

NotSoSlowSHO said:
I suppose your "research" came in part from radartest.com, as many of your posts are nearly copied word for word from their latest reviews. BTW, you might want to lok into where radartests.com gets their funding ;)

I didn't copy a single sentence from them, and that is not where I did my "research." I'm not stupid enough to read reviews on biased sights. Could you please copy and paste what I "copied" word for word?

NotSoSlowSHO said:
And please do tell us about all of this "testing" of yours. This testing must be fool-proof, for you to come out and state that your Bell is without a doubt, superior to the V1.
Fool proof? No, no testing is full proof and I never claimed it to be. I'm still waiting to see any good justification to pay over an extra $150 bucks for a V1....

NotSoSlowSHO said:
Im not saying that the Bell isnt a nice unit. Im sure it is. But the V1 is tried and true, is always offering updates, and is just $70 more than your beloved Bell. And the Bell doesnt even offer a rear mounted sensor. The arrows alone make the V1 one worth every penny in my book.
Bell offers updates also just FYI. ****, V1 didn't even have POP technology until recently, they refused to even acknowledge it as a viable threat! V1 costs more than $70 more if you know where to get the Bell; even $70 is a lot of money in my book, especially when it's wasted. I'm not even going to get into the technicalities of why a rear mounted sensor is useless. As far as the arrows, half the time they point in the wrong direction which makes them completely useless anyhow.

NotSoSlowSHO said:
Don't be sorry, your just trying to justify the money you wasted, its understandable. It's your money, not mine, I could care less. :snicker:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
107,087
Messages
1,181,313
Members
16,153
Latest member
lapochkarr
Back
Top