FWIW, the ceramic TOB was not necessarily developed to make a longer life bearing, rather, it was developed to lessen the effects of skidding wear between the bearing contact face and the clutch fingers. Many early SHO clutch failures were caused by the bearing face wearing away or even cutting through the clutch release fingers, and this occurred with both the Rev A and B TOBs, though the Rev A bearings, which had a smaller throat inner diameter, weren't in service all that long anyway.
The fellow who proposed and developed the "ceramic" TOB was an aerospace and materials engineer, and he proposed that the high spinning mass of the bearing was causing skidding wear between the bearing contact face and the clutch fingers, and that reducing the mass of the TOB's guts would lower its inertia and allow it to track the spinning clutch fingers without skidding.
He proposed swapping out the steel balls in the factory Rev B bearing with ceramic balls, which are lower mass and smoother than steel balls, and so in theory should produce a bearing with lower inertia.
I was one of the initial testers of this ceramic bearing, because I was, at the time, solidly open tracking a Gen 1 '89 SHO, and due to that use, I was changing clutches more often than some of you change your undershorts, so I could monitor clutch finger wear pretty readily. My impression at the time was that the ceramic TOB lowered the wear rate of the clutch fingers compared to the factory OEM Rev B bearing.
So there...