Jan 15, 2007 #21 shomesomesho G-force addict Joined Mar 1, 2005 Messages 1,206 Reaction score 43 Location more rubber, more HP..... Time for a refund.
Jan 15, 2007 #22 TrueBlue Rocket Surgeon Joined Feb 19, 2004 Messages 405 Reaction score 0 Location Angola, NY What is that?! PM me please.
Jan 15, 2007 #23 SLoW_SHO_316 Runcarsnotwords Joined Sep 14, 2004 Messages 555 Reaction score 41 Location Connecticut I sent you an E-mail.
Jan 15, 2007 #24 TrueBlue Rocket Surgeon Joined Feb 19, 2004 Messages 405 Reaction score 0 Location Angola, NY Replied.
Jan 15, 2007 #25 SLoW_SHO_316 Runcarsnotwords Joined Sep 14, 2004 Messages 555 Reaction score 41 Location Connecticut Here's a couple higher res pics of the damage. It almost looks like the head can be used as the gouge is not completely in the coolant channel.
Here's a couple higher res pics of the damage. It almost looks like the head can be used as the gouge is not completely in the coolant channel.
Jan 15, 2007 #26 SLoW_SHO_316 Runcarsnotwords Joined Sep 14, 2004 Messages 555 Reaction score 41 Location Connecticut
Jan 15, 2007 #27 SASHO91 Zoom Zoom Joined Feb 3, 2004 Messages 6,990 Reaction score 141 Location San Antonio,TX Nick, even though it is not in the coolant passage, its still a stress rasier. It will fail again. Seems like you have two options... 1: take the head to a welder( a GOOD welder) and have them patch the hole. Then take it to get planed, but even then your still risking it. 2:take your losses and ditch that head, and find another. or there is always option 3- ditch the sho alltogether...
Nick, even though it is not in the coolant passage, its still a stress rasier. It will fail again. Seems like you have two options... 1: take the head to a welder( a GOOD welder) and have them patch the hole. Then take it to get planed, but even then your still risking it. 2:take your losses and ditch that head, and find another. or there is always option 3- ditch the sho alltogether...
Jan 15, 2007 #28 SLoW_SHO_316 Runcarsnotwords Joined Sep 14, 2004 Messages 555 Reaction score 41 Location Connecticut This is so frustrating... Does anyone have the head bolt torque specs/sequence?
Jan 15, 2007 #29 SASHO91 Zoom Zoom Joined Feb 3, 2004 Messages 6,990 Reaction score 141 Location San Antonio,TX step 1-36-51 step 2-61-69 I dont have the sequence though, sorry... BTW, the maximum waprage on the heads is .008''
step 1-36-51 step 2-61-69 I dont have the sequence though, sorry... BTW, the maximum waprage on the heads is .008''
Jan 15, 2007 #30 SLoW_SHO_316 Runcarsnotwords Joined Sep 14, 2004 Messages 555 Reaction score 41 Location Connecticut So max tq on the head bolts is 69 ft/lbs? That could be a problem that I tq'd them down to 80 last time I did this.
So max tq on the head bolts is 69 ft/lbs? That could be a problem that I tq'd them down to 80 last time I did this.
Jan 15, 2007 #31 SHOMurph Ford B@stard Joined Feb 1, 2002 Messages 1,806 Reaction score 188 Location Arlington, TX I'd get another head. Too much work to risk welding or another torque down.
Jan 16, 2007 #32 thecrew2999 3.2 MTX SHO Joined Apr 14, 2006 Messages 1,664 Reaction score 45 Location Harrisburg/WilliamsportPA sounds to me like you need a service cd if you dont know tq specs. heads are one of the most important things to get in proper spec.
sounds to me like you need a service cd if you dont know tq specs. heads are one of the most important things to get in proper spec.
Jan 16, 2007 #33 AREA 91 PA SHO SHOP Joined Jul 17, 2002 Messages 5,349 Reaction score 1,003 Location Area 91 If you torqued the head bolts to 80ftlbs, you are risking damage to the threads in the block.