Going to turbo.....

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

91PDXmocha

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
543
Reaction score
229
Location
Portland , Oregon
I think our turbos are close to the same size , 60ar 63t .
How much psi do you run normally ? You said in your drag thread u where trapping 104 and was turning the boost up to 10 psi to try and get more mph . So you pretty sure this size turbo is not going to make much more power ?

I know Scott used the same turbo as me when he first started his remote set up and made over 300 whp ,might even of been 340+ whp . Maybe he will chime in here , he knows the remote system well .

edit - Scott made 358whp at 10 psi with the same turbo as me set up in remote style.
 
Last edited:

yamahaSHO

E85 whore
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
10,646
Reaction score
2,516
Location
Arkansas
Trust me, the stock programming is making you run 14.6 afr's at 5psi.
.

The ECU only knows RPM, load and WOT. If one of the critera isn't met for the stock program, then it will run lean. I know the Stock ECU is targeting 11's, and the load should be met with boost, but I can't recall what RPM that happens at the moment.
 
Last edited:

SHO Dude

Sponsoring Vendor
Sponsoring Vendor
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
111
Location
Southeast
Here's another thread of what we do for a turbo kit on these cars.

http://www.shoforum.com/showthread.php?t=106885

We put the turbo in the back and used a separate oiling system with a reservoir. put 365hp and 405ft-lbs of torque on the ground.

Got a kit left if anyone is interested. I'm also starting a new project for an ATX car.
 

yamahaSHO

E85 whore
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
10,646
Reaction score
2,516
Location
Arkansas
Was that corrected or uncorrected?

I don't remember Scott's #'s, but the dyno was unable to load the engine and he had a hard time building boost.
 

SHO Dude

Sponsoring Vendor
Sponsoring Vendor
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
111
Location
Southeast
Corrected for barometric pressure only, but tq and hp on the tires thru a Dynojet dyno.

That was also 18psi on a built motor.

A stock engine sould be able to take 9psi and survive.
 

Cnp22

Just a V6......
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
43
Reaction score
10
Location
Cleburne tx.
Do you sell a kit with just piping, and stuff like that minus turbo, fuel pump, maf?
 

Sho Amo

SmkTyresntDrugs
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
856
Location
Olney, Md
My turbo has the same a/r's as yours but my problem is the actual size. Its only like a 50 trim. So my turbo wont let the exhaust out fast enough. This is why I wont really be doing anything with it until I get my new turbo.

we ran almost the same trap speed and your car is a stock 3.0 with 5psi lol.
 

Toolman

Boost it!
Club Mod
Joined
Jan 28, 2001
Messages
6,765
Reaction score
3,163
Location
Grand Lake, Oklahoma, USA
Corrected for barometric pressure only, but tq and hp on the tires thru a Dynojet dyno.

That was also 18psi on a built motor.

A stock engine sould be able to take 9psi and survive.

Nice, I was unaware either of the 'stealth' turbo projects you built were worked over. Got any dyno sheets? Wondering what that curve looks like, 40ft lbs more tq than HP. I am assuming it makes gobs of TQ down low but the HP is fairly light after 6000rpm?
 

Toolman

Boost it!
Club Mod
Joined
Jan 28, 2001
Messages
6,765
Reaction score
3,163
Location
Grand Lake, Oklahoma, USA
I wonder what a remote mount with a larger turbo would look like. While the numbers up high for these smaller turbo's look pretty pathetic, I can promise you that the meaty TQ in the middle of the powerband are a lot of fun. My lower HP small turbo car was actually a bit more 'fun' to drive most of the time, since the TQ was more accessible.
 

SHO Dude

Sponsoring Vendor
Sponsoring Vendor
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
111
Location
Southeast
The bigger the turbo, the more exhaust energy it needs to get going. So the peak ends up later in the curve.

Having the fat part of the torque curve in the middle is great. This car pulls in 5th gear like it's in 4th. 70mph on the highway at 2800rpm, just squeeze the throttle and here comes the power.

We're working on a twin turbo project to cure this little issue. Stay tuned.
 

Sho Amo

SmkTyresntDrugs
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
856
Location
Olney, Md
Yeah, but on the other end its fwd so having all that torque breaks the tires loose down low. Plus, this engine lives to rev, so its kinda lame to have your real power down low.
 

SHO Dude

Sponsoring Vendor
Sponsoring Vendor
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
111
Location
Southeast
Ya know, I thought the same thing until I drove the car.

Holly crap! At highway speeds, you don't need to downshift. Just squeeze the throttle and here comes the power. This thing accelerates in 5th like it's in 4th.

The other thing is that I think it's really a blessing to run out of steam at the top. I think it saves powertrain parts. So if you run it up to 6800rpm and pull the next gear, you lift to shift and dump all the boost off. Now you're hitting the next gear with 200ft-lbs of torque instead of something double that. Not like a supercharger where the hp curve is a straight line into the rev limiter.

I really didn't think that before I drove the car, but now I like the idea a lot more.
 

Sho Amo

SmkTyresntDrugs
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
856
Location
Olney, Md
Lol Doug, I feel the opposite. I think having so much torque down low would wear driveline parts out faster. My car is fun to drive on the street because the power is always right there. I just hate it on the track.

****, I was hitting 5psi through cruise control lol.
 

yamahaSHO

E85 whore
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
10,646
Reaction score
2,516
Location
Arkansas
I think Doug is more worried about the 'powertrain' where high RPM really does wear motors quickly.

The one thing I remember about Scott's remote turbo is that the torque didn't spike hard and fast (probably due to all the piping), so he was really able to pull some decent launches without roasting the tires, but when he was ready to move, it did just that.

You can play with timing and fuel remove some of the spool during cruise, but given the gearing on these cars and the load they create, boosting in the higher gears with a turbo is going to happen. One thing I do like about the turbo in the STi is I don't have to downshift on the freeway to pass. The SC on the SHO has to be spinning pretty hard and requires me to downshift and get into the upper RPM taxing the engine harder than the lower RPM torque.
 

91PDXmocha

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
543
Reaction score
229
Location
Portland , Oregon
Dang , 5 psi in cruise control haha

I was kinda worried my turbo was going to be to small but after driving even at 5 psi im confident its pretty nicely sized for a DD turbo/engine bay set-up, lots of usable torque . The .63 exh side with 2.5 UP seems to start to build at 2800 and pegs 5 psi by 3600-3700, wg struggling to keep up. full boost right as you hit the secondaries, then it really pins you in the seat in .
 

yamahaSHO

E85 whore
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
10,646
Reaction score
2,516
Location
Arkansas
I don't even feel secondaries anymore. I bet with some tuning, you wouldn't either :)
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
107,085
Messages
1,181,294
Members
16,152
Latest member
lapochkarr

Members online

Back
Top