Excited to see the finished results. Are you going to get another dyno done for comparison?
I'm not planning on it. I might give the dyno near me another shot not to mess up the dyno session but it'll be hard to know the comparison to OEM 10-12 manifolds and non ported GH Turbos when I'm those aren't the only changes made. For those that don't know I also added the EPP Dual CAI, MSD Coils, XDI35 and DW LPFP at the same time. It wouldn't be a fair comparison but it would show improvements for sure.
For those that don't know, my only Dyno session ever I made 463/569 with stock manifolds, stock HPFP, stock LPFP, GH Turbos, catless downpipes, custom Exhaust, 3bar, meth injection and 93 octane @ 19 psi AJPTurbo tune.....ran it twice and then flashed an 18 psi tune for 418/521 on a mustang dyno. 18 psi was so much lower I think bc on initial flash my OAR resets low and takes some driving before it gets back to .96. We finished after the 18 psi pull, all multi gear pulls too that the dyno tech wanted to do. My first time I agreed to it as that was what he wanted to do. But then he printed the graph out and it said a different set of numbers...extremely low numbers. Like how is that even possible? Anytime I've seen someone get a Dyno done the graph or print out is exactly what the dyno screen results say. It printed out I was 379awhp and 406 awtq on the 18 psi tune that the dyno screen read with WCF correction 418/521. It printed out my WCF corrected 463/569 was 399awhp/434awtq. Massive....MASSIVE discrepancy. Has anyone ever heard of this before? Why would it print out different numbers that were never seen or calculated at the end of each pull on the dyno screen?
To me the dyno session was completely worthless since the information collected was inconsistent, although my two back to back runs of 19 psi were the same result on the screen at the end of each run. The dyno tech even changed the load on the car, first run 3500...second and third run at 6500! Said it would build boost faster and hold it longer. AJPTurbo cringed at that and when he saw my datalogs of the runs and you see load spikes of 211.....it was full tilt! Full everything.
Initially the dyno tech was apologetic about the print out numbers, said sorry about this I thought it was fixed....said it happened to another customer...said he would send me the correct print out. He goes up front of the shop, leaves it to me to back out of their really odd oriented back garage door, not to mention driving over dyno rollers is weird as ****. To leave I had to cut super sharp to avoid a van parked parallel to the door like 15 ft away...car is like 18ft, so I crank the wheel sharp and boom hit a truck axle, scratches my front chin spoiler....like WTF! Why was that there?
So my experience went from fun as **** to downright horrific and unpleasant in a matter of min. The whole point was to collect data on a mustang dyno that does read lower than most but I didn't expect huge number differences from a click of a button: PRINT??? And then the truck axle and damage. I showed the dyno tech and he didn't charge me the $150 it would be for the dyno. He also never sent me corrected numbers, in fact he claimed he sent me the file from the pulls but never did....and asked if I had the car making full boost...bruh...my tuner cringed at my logs...it was full everything.
So even if I do go back...what am I comparing numbers too? What good are those numbers compared to anyone else on either a dyno jet, dyno con? When you consider all the fluctuations and inconsistencies ....to me that takes away from what I originally thought dyno numbers are. One thing that is non negotionable is a quarter mile time. That's the ONLY thing we DO compare each other to.
Wish my dyno session just printed out what it said and I would be fine. So there ya go, as of this post, 2nd World's Fastest Ecoboost SHO only had 399\434? If that were true that should be a record itself. Clearly untrue. So I'm not running to any dyno anytime soon. I'll see you guys at the track.
SBS for me such a simple question became super complicated response...for me anyway. Just being real.