Geek SHO
SHO Addict
"Mic" them? You mean examine them with a micrometer? That's just like a very precise caliper, right? I should look into getting something like that.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

How about piston assembly. Does it matter which way the rods face?

Yes. The "KOA" should point towards the front of the engine. Here's page 83 of the Ford SHO Engine Book, which tells you all about rod installation:How about piston assembly. Does it matter which way the rods face?
Sean's short block came from my parted out SuperSHO. I used a ball-end hone on the cylinders, as suggested. I may not have taken it deep enough, so the best thing to do would be to take it to a machine shop that is experienced in honing cylinder walls for a second opinion. Ten minute job to take the cross hatching deeper.Well, the cross hatching is way too "flat". There is a certaing way to do it that yields 45 degree patterns. With a ball-end hone this is accomplished by always moving the hone in or out of the cylinder at the sme speed as the hone is rotating. It's a difficult movement to make because it's more natural for us to "drill that sucker" clean with the drill on high speed. Cross hatching is not for making the cylinder smooth, it's for making the cylinder rough so that oil sticks to the grooves.
The wrist pins look fine; but how do they "mic" out. Little pits like that are not a problem unless the outer surfact has started to come off. Mic them to make sure they are not ovalized.
Tom
Also, when I was installing the rings on the pistons, there was no gap above or below the rings, but the install instructions say that there should be 0.004" gap for each inch of cylinder diameter, so I figured 0.014" because it's a 3.5" bore. I could barely get the 0.0015" feeler gauge in there. Are these just "gapless" rings then?
This is turning into a bit of a "How-to-build-an-engine", but that's not a bad thing to have floating on the forum.
I called an engine shop today, and by my description, they said that I shouldn't have a problem with the mild angled cross hatching hone, assuming that I'm not using "moly" rings, as opposed to steel. Granted, this shop may not know what a SHO engine is, and I don't really know what the rings are made of, except that they are Hastings 3.2 rings. They said something about steel rings seating really quickly to the walls, and it shouldn't be a problem. Are the Hastings rings "moly"?
Also, when I was installing the rings on the pistons, there was no gap above or below the rings, but the install instructions say that there should be 0.004" gap for each inch of cylinder diameter, so I figured 0.014" because it's a 3.5" bore. I could barely get the 0.0015" feeler gauge in there. Are these just "gapless" rings then?
Yes. Is there an easy way to do this? My dad says that there's a special tool to do this and it's really tedious.