SHOMurph
Ford B@stard
engine swap any day over rebuild. Still alot of good 3.2s out there with 120-130k with bad trannies selling cheap.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.







Well, the stock 3.2L block is really just a bored-out 3.0L block; it doesn't have any more material than the 3.0L block (this was argued many times over the years, as to whether or not the early 3.0L blocks were different from (thicker than) the late 3.0L & 3.2L blocks, but I don't buy it), so whatever the upper limit of a 3.0L block, it's roughly the same for a 3.2L block. That is, you don't get anything extra from starting with a 3.2L block.If a 3.0 can be re-bored to 3.2, can a 3.2 be re-bored to 3.4 ?
Actually there is, it's called cubic centimeters.There is no substitute for cubic inches.
I wonder how many of these bored 3.3L blocks have been done.I'm going to keep the rusty 3.2 that's in the car now, maybe for boring out to 3.3L with Wiseco pistons, but if the low compression 3.2 works out well, I might just chuck it.
My blue car is on hold for the moment, so the black car got some more attention on the interior. A couple days ago it looked like this:
I think I like the look of no center console. Kinda old school muscle car-ish.
I removed the stereo deck and test fit a DIN sized gauge panel I found at the Pick N Pull on a '92 SLO:
This is how far I got yesterday:
Any tips for removing the tar layering the floor of the car? Heat gun and a scraper? I never knew my car had rear foot-well heater vents. Was this a common option? I think I'll leave it in because it's just a big piece of plastic. I'll save weight elsewhere.
Stay tuned for pictures of the huge trove of treasures I found underneath all the carpets.
Yeah, I forgot to mention that my "facts" are most likely very skewed from reality... My brain just regurgitates its best approximation of what it stored who-knows-how-long ago, so it's only occasionally accurate.I think John Miller's motor is stroked to 3.6, but don't take my word for it.
Okay, so I just realized (from jthod's post in another thread) that my math is off by .200" because of my stupid brain forgetting that a wall thickness is included twice in an overbore number, since bore is a diameter, not a radius.IIRC, there is .200" of "meat" left in the 3.0L block cylinder walls, and boring to 3.2L (to use stock 3.2L pistons/rods) is a ~.122" overbore. Much more than that will probably significantly weaken the cylinder walls, and to bore to 3.4L (without stroking) would be a ~.239" overbore, which is impossible with .200" thick walls!
Well, that's the $64,000 question...Does the 3.2 block have more material to start with? is the 3.0 and 3.2 ATX the same block?