Valve cleaning...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Lincoln SHO

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2016
Messages
56
Reaction score
41
Location
NE
Got my car back and tried to get some pictures with a borescope. I’m not very good at this. There’s some buildup, but overall pretty clean.

I’m sure I didn't get all 6 cylinders, but I’m much less worried about this now. At a minimum, I don't think it's blocking any airflow.

WIN 20200721 20 16 54 Pro WIN 20200721 20 20 07 Pro WIN 20200721 20 20 41 Pro WIN 20200721 20 20 52 Pro WIN 20200721 20 21 23 Pro WIN 20200721 20 22 27 Pro WIN 20200721 20 24 43 Pro WIN 20200721 20 25 02 Pro
 

4sfed

SHO Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Messages
368
Reaction score
348
Location
St. Louis, MO
Got my car back and tried to get some pictures with a borescope. I’m not very good at this. There’s some buildup, but overall pretty clean.

I’m sure I didn't get all 6 cylinders, but I’m much less worried about this now. At a minimum, I don't think it's blocking any airflow.

View attachment 14840 View attachment 14841 View attachment 14842 View attachment 14843 View attachment 14844 View attachment 14845 View attachment 14846 View attachment 14847
I guess I'm used to those ports being shiney clean. But that doesn't look good to be.

So how bad is bad enough to cause performance or mileage issues?

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
 

Lincoln SHO

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2016
Messages
56
Reaction score
41
Location
NE
I guess I'm used to those ports being shiney clean. But that doesn't look good to be.

So how bad is bad enough to cause performance or mileage issues?

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
I’d like to know that too. I expected the carbon to be caked on all of them, and some of them don’t seem to have any buildup.

I’ll probably still have them cleaned. Not sure when, but I’ll try to get some before and after pictures.
 

Zpak

Es Aich Oh!
Joined
Jun 1, 2017
Messages
1,990
Reaction score
2,540
Location
The region, Indiana
I guess I'm used to those ports being shiney clean. But that doesn't look good to be.

So how bad is bad enough to cause performance or mileage issues?

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
Unfortunately in DI engines his and my pics are just par for the course. Thus, why catch cans are so important to try to mitigate this as much as possible and despite what anyone says, why auxiliary port injection was added to ecoboosts.
 

6500rpm

Quality Always Shoots Straight
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
590
Reaction score
653
Location
The safe zone outside metro St Louis
You guys are awesome, no idea how badly I need it at this point, but that has to be the best $20 I've spent in a long time. I've seen newer DI engines that look way worse than the ones posted. Lee hit the nail on the head for me with the comment about the only way out is through the turbo's.
I've struggled with the concept of driveability issues in the DI engine, after all, it's just flowing forced induction air. I can remember in the old GM 454 engines that valve coking caused issues because the fuel hit the coked up valves and there was a sponging effect with the fuel, that's not the case with our DI's. On the other hand, I fully understand a chunk of that crap breaking off and being ingested by the turbo.

Whoever modeled that little device did us all a great favor.
 
Back
Top