LMS T460 gains big power while resolving other concerns!

[luigisho]

I switched to Hptuners because SCT can't tune 10speeds very well.

You running a truck?

 

[SM105K]

I've heard from plenty of fellow Dodge/Mopar owners that they (aren't) good.

Seems they're preying on the next group of unsuspecting owner's (and their wallets).

The one's I have spoken to, I have cringed for them and then provide them with the same info you have been repeating here SM105k.

Along with my own personal experiences.

It's being noticed.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

It just sucks to see something like this happen. The problem is, there are unsuspecting owners (along with their wallets) that believe the hype, and jump in. It is a pretty easy sell for the less technical people. Is LMS the first? **** no. Are they the last to fall from grace? **** no.

You want to see a complete S show....Go on LS1Tech and research the Kentucky Turbo fiasco....WOW! Lots of money, stolen parts, fraud...like a mini Hennessy explosion. I was wildly vocal there as well. Any LS other trans plants on here that were on Tech will remember that.

 

[High on Ethanol]

You running a truck?

Yessir!

 

[luigisho]

Jealous. My '14 coyote tranny is a mush box.

 

[SM105K]

Jealous. My '14 coyote tranny is a mush box.

You can fix that...with a 2014 SHO.

 

[High on Ethanol]

The only downside to the truck is they don't make LSD anymore... and I'm not sure how bad launching with the locker engaged is...

On the bright side,4wd launches at 2k work well.

 

[802SHO]

The only downside to the truck is they don't make LSD anymore... and I'm not sure how bad launching with the locker engaged is...

On the bright side,4wd launches at 2k work well.

LSD is still around.......

 

[High on Ethanol]

Not in factory Ford F-150 trucks(excluding raptor). It's either open or e-locked.

 

[802SHO]

Not in factory Ford F-150 trucks(excluding raptor). It's either open or e-locked.

I failed horribly at making a joke. I was thinking Jimi Hendrix

 

[High on Ethanol]

I failed horribly at making a joke. I was thinking Jimi Hendrix

LSD nowadays would be scary, reality already trips me out

 

[Livernois Motorsports]

Ha! And if they do respond who is going to believe it? Unless they provide factual data points that are easily verifiable, then anything they say will be taken with a dose of skepticism.

We certainly welcome anyone who has one of our mycal tuners to test out this new version for themselves. A lot of customers are stating that they no longer have the issues that were once a concern in version 11, we also will continue to post any future updates on these vehicles as we continue to develop future items and support. We will continue to work towards future success and improved customer support. We understand everyone has their own preferences on how they would like certain things done to their vehicles but we prefer vehicles running our tune are safe and long lasting while still making a ton of power over a stock vehicle. Tons of our customers have been tuned for 50-75k+ miles which speaks volumes, my own personal car being one of those, my car has never gotten any special dyno tune or secret revisions, even on v11 my vehicle never experienced any issues, these cars can be tempermental sometimes its just how they are im sure you all agree, we will not be just abandoning the support for these vehicles or anyone on this forum.

 

[StealBlueSho]

We certainly welcome anyone who has one of our mycal tuners to test out this new version for themselves. A lot of customers are stating that they no longer have the issues that were once a concern in version 11, we also will continue to post any future updates on these vehicles as we continue to develop future items and support. We will continue to work towards future success and improved customer support. We understand everyone has their own preferences on how they would like certain things done to their vehicles but we prefer vehicles running our tune are safe and long lasting while still making a ton of power over a stock vehicle. Tons of our customers have been tuned for 50-75k+ miles which speaks volumes, my own personal car being one of those, my car has never gotten any special dyno tune or secret revisions, even on v11 my vehicle never experienced any issues, these cars can be tempermental sometimes its just how they are im sure you all agree, we will not be just abandoning the support for these vehicles or anyone on this forum.

Cody is that you?

 

[Jordan_R]

We certainly welcome anyone who has one of our mycal tuners to test out this new version for themselves. A lot of customers are stating that they no longer have the issues that were once a concern in version 11, we also will continue to post any future updates on these vehicles as we continue to develop future items and support. We will continue to work towards future success and improved customer support. We understand everyone has their own preferences on how they would like certain things done to their vehicles but we prefer vehicles running our tune are safe and long lasting while still making a ton of power over a stock vehicle. Tons of our customers have been tuned for 50-75k+ miles which speaks volumes, my own personal car being one of those, my car has never gotten any special dyno tune or secret revisions, even on v11 my vehicle never experienced any issues, these cars can be tempermental sometimes its just how they are im sure you all agree, we will not be just abandoning the support for these vehicles or anyone on this forum.

I'm curious. Did you guys see any issue with the v11 tunes that required the change? And I am not sure what you mean on tempermental..

 

[76FoMoCo]

You should offer a mycal buy back to all v11 tunes. Imo

 

[76FoMoCo]

but you will go broke.. if you do. I do credit LMS as i first got tuned buy them and quickly found Ajp.

 

[SM105K]

We certainly welcome anyone who has one of our mycal tuners to test out this new version for themselves. A lot of customers are stating that they no longer have the issues that were once a concern in version 11, we also will continue to post any future updates on these vehicles as we continue to develop future items and support. We will continue to work towards future success and improved customer support. We understand everyone has their own preferences on how they would like certain things done to their vehicles but we prefer vehicles running our tune are safe and long lasting while still making a ton of power over a stock vehicle. Tons of our customers have been tuned for 50-75k+ miles which speaks volumes, my own personal car being one of those, my car has never gotten any special dyno tune or secret revisions, even on v11 my vehicle never experienced any issues, these cars can be tempermental sometimes its just how they are im sure you all agree, we will not be just abandoning the support for these vehicles or anyone on this forum.

Blahahaha I bolded the best statement LMS has ever posted!

That is rich. The LMS employee that posts on the SHO forum, has had zero preferred treatment for his SHO.... I trust Mexcian tap water more.

I got some ocean front property in Arizona I will sell you cheap!

 

[802SHO]

Maybe........MAYBE.......if the dark cloud (also known as Dan Millen) leaves and a new owner steps in.....MAYBE.....MAYBE......that would turn things around. But that is extremely unlikely.

 

[stripSHO]

Here we go, now you are acting like a child...just like stripSHO. Let me break it down for you.

You literally couldn't pick up on my point about e30. Clearly the point was not comparing e30 to 93. It was saying even e30 on stock HPFP was fine so you dont need one for 93 especially...

Pretty simple. You tracking?

Also you are literally arguing on the side of the idea of LMS. You clearly have no idea of who they actually are in reality. How many owners came out in the threads with problems. How many left LMS because LMS literally want to use those cars as a guinea pig?

If you did, then you wouldn't be blindly defending them.

Hey I appreciate you pressing pause on your little rant to give me a shout out! Thanks for including me daddy! Obsessing over me, are we? Is SBS really my brother? Why didn't you tell us sooner, daddy?

For those trying to digest this latest trash campaign in the hive mind's eternal personal vendetta against Livernois, the problem with trying to pick up on Easton's point he's trying to preach down to everyone is that, like with his other conspiracy theories, he has no idea what he's talking about and it's a completely false narrative. E30 @ .82 lambda actually requires 2% LESS FUEL than pump gas commanded to .74 lambda like in a Livernois tune. Oof!!! And given that simple ratios clearly escape you, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if you're only actually mixing to e25 or so. On top of that ethanol is more dense and higher viscosity than gasoline, effectively giving a slight performance nudge to the hpfp itself. But it's still all moot. You could also write a safe tune for e85 or even M1 methanol with the stock hpfp. And doing so would prove or demonstrate... absolutely nothing about gasoline.

Bicker about afr preferences all you want. But they're just that, preferences. Let's see one of these lean tunes compete in an endurance race, or do a 10 mile salt pull, then maybe we could have an intelligent debate over what's actually safe based on data that spans more than a couple seconds of high load at a time . Until then all we're doing here is sitting around listening to a guy who can't even read his own fuel trims spout all his "expertise" on the platform's fuel system.

Call me crazy, but to outright publicly accuse a vendor of fraudulently fattening their tunes (by GOING LEANER THAN STOCK btw, how the **** do you rationalize that) as part of a deliberate sales scam with nothing to back it besides your worthless and incorrect amateur opinion on the stock fuel system sure seems like a clear cut case of libel to me. Violating site terms just for the sake of provoking legal trouble between the site and a sponsering vendor... in the midst of an ongoing effort to actively silence anybody reporting positive interactions with them... yeah what a great moderator you would make, I'm sure!

I get it: Mike flooded his crankcase with gas in a simple bonehead mistake and decided to drive it 300 bearing-burning miles that way, to Livernois' doorstep and now the entire world is expected to hate LMS until the end of time over it. I don't know about anyone else here, but I don't even have time to carry my own grudges let alone sit and watch fools throw tantrums each and every single time someone as much as mentions their initials. Get. The ****. Over. It. Let your dollars do your talking and just shut up already.

 

[SM105K]

Hey I appreciate you pressing pause on your little rant to give me a shout out! Thanks for including me daddy! Obsessing over me, are we? Is SBS really my brother? Why didn't you tell us sooner, daddy?

For those trying to digest this latest trash campaign in the hive mind's eternal personal vendetta against Livernois, the problem with trying to pick up on Easton's point he's trying to preach down to everyone is that, like with his other conspiracy theories, he has no idea what he's talking about and it's a completely false narrative. E30 @ .82 lambda actually requires 2% LESS FUEL than pump gas commanded to .74 lambda like in a Livernois tune. Oof!!! And given that simple ratios clearly escape you, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if you're only actually mixing to e25 or so. On top of that ethanol is more dense and higher viscosity than gasoline, effectively giving a slight performance nudge to the hpfp itself. But it's still all moot. You could also write a safe tune for e85 or even M1 methanol with the stock hpfp. And doing so would prove or demonstrate... absolutely nothing about gasoline.

Bicker about afr preferences all you want. But they're just that, preferences. Let's see one of these lean tunes compete in an endurance race, or do a 10 mile salt pull, then maybe we could have an intelligent debate over what's actually safe based on data that spans more than a couple seconds of high load at a time . Until then all we're doing here is sitting around listening to a guy who can't even read his own fuel trims spout all his "expertise" on the platform's fuel system.

Call me crazy, but to outright publicly accuse a vendor of fraudulently fattening their tunes (by GOING LEANER THAN STOCK btw, how the **** do you rationalize that) as part of a deliberate sales scam with nothing to back it besides your worthless and incorrect amateur opinion on the stock fuel system sure seems like a clear cut case of libel to me. Violating site terms just for the sake of provoking legal trouble between the site and a sponsering vendor... in the midst of an ongoing effort to actively silence anybody reporting positive interactions with them... yeah what a great moderator you would make, I'm sure!

I get it: Mike flooded his crankcase with gas in a simple bonehead mistake and decided to drive it 300 bearing-burning miles that way, to Livernois' doorstep and now the entire world is expected to hate LMS until the end of time over it. I don't know about anyone else here, but I don't even have time to carry my own grudges let alone sit and watch fools throw tantrums each and every single time someone as much as mentions their initials. Get. The ****. Over. It. Let your dollars do your talking and just shut up already.

Hooray, you are back! Go away again, adults are talking here.

 

[SM105K]

LMS would you like to chime in on this as well? Just wondering.......

https://www.ecoboostperformanceforum.com/index.php/topic,10397.0.html