moobypets came in from Canada with pics of his Essex torque chain and everyone ignored him.
QUOTE]
love this lol
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
moobypets came in from Canada with pics of his Essex torque chain and everyone ignored him.
QUOTE]
love this lol
As far as I can tell, no one has actually claimed any advantages of the solid mount over the chain concept, other than the fact that the chain is "ghetto", "ni**A rigged", "risky" and "dangerous", with no explanation about how or why this is the case.
The chain, on the other hand, is cheaper, quicker, easier, doesn't transmit vibration under compression or stasis, and limits engine movement (and in both directions if you use 2 chains) same as (or better than) a solid mount. At least three well-respected forum members (not counting myself) defended the chain idea as being at least a good solution, if not superior to a solid mount.

yeah ok but you dont see it it under the hood so who care
Yup. I see it as a "no frills" kind of thing. It's kinda like marrying a fat chick. You may not be proud to strut around town with her on your arm, but she's probably a better mother than a peroxide-laden silicone-implanted 110lb. California girl.