silkyjohnson
New Member
Ive been reading alot of comments lately about the atx trannys. Since this is my first sho, Ive been trying to get to know as much as I can. Is it just the 93's that are bad, or is it all second generation atxs?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
The very nature of any automatic transmission is that it will need to be rebuilt/replaced.
Instead of having an external clutch (like a stick), they are all internal and every single shift they are gradually wearing out.
Sooner or later they wear out all the way and need replacement.
Combine that with the fact that people generally neglect servicing their auto tranny and drive the crap out of their car, some don't last too long.
It isn't that the SHO ATX's are weak, it is just the nature of Auto tranny's in general.
I got 143k out of my original ATX, and 75k out of my rebuild (crappy rebuild), and am running a FoMoCo remanned one right now.
Doug
you are really lucky w/ your Cherokee if you have 220k on the original trans. the Jeep trans are pieces of crap way worse than the 90s Ford transmissions and almost always need rebuilt by 100k or sooner.


My new trans sees 7600rpm on a daily basis![]()
wow i dont know where you get your information but if you go onto the jeep forum or cherokee forum they will all tell you the non chrysler trans is immortal
**** there waa guys running around with 500k on oringional engine and trans that was nothing more then water pump changes or alt etc, wear items
Lol @ Sean. "New" I knew someone with a ATX who had to rebuild his tranny three times before he finally gave up on the car. When I got a SHO I refused to get a ATX because of the reputation.
That being said I have also heard that if you get the tranny rebuilt right they're ok-- but again there's that whole bit where you have to get it rebuilt because the original is fail.