Man I look at this and think back to the old L98's which didn't kick the fans on till 242*![]()
Honestly throwing a 170* thermostat in seems a little 1970ish to me and I don't really know what would be gained. This engine is far more complex then an old SBC. My understanding was these engines were designed combustion wise to burn hot (1,700*). Keeping that combustion chamber hot is going to ensure good fuel atomization and help mix air and fuel faster for more complete combustion. Being direct injected and having less time to mix than other types of fuel injection I could definitely see this helping. This is where I start to question whether or not you're going to gain or hurt performance. Trying to lower the coolant temp in the block could actually slow the air/fuel mixing process in the combustion chamber and hurt performance.
In this day and age I have to believe that if there was performance/reliability to be gained from varying the thermostat temps the manufacturers would use an electronic thermostat that the ecu could control.
Agreed 100%. I was curious what the egt's were on the stock ecoboost. Chrysler calibrated the caliber and neon srt-4 turbo engines at 1720 degrees for the stock engines and for the staged upgrades. Pretty damn hot for oem cars. It's one of the reasons why I haven't bothered with a tune yet on the SHO. Nobody has posted anything about egts that I found between stock and a tuned ecoboost engine.
Last edited: