AutoSHO
No SHO = Mo $$$
The difference between a MAF giving the computer a signal to run 14:1 and 12.5:1 is not a big enough difference that simply backprobing the sensor is going to show a problem.
The Mass Air Flow sensor measures air mass (hence the name) which means that air density has an effect on the sensor's output - This is what makes it better than a speed density (MAP) system. It can account for the changing air density at differing elevations, temperatures, etc.
The SHO would run very poorly or not at all if the MAF signal was way out of whack - Thats why I said it is pointless to backprobe it. The minute differences involved are not enough that simply stating it should be around 4v at WOT/7000 rpm will provide any real results for Dale. I had a MAF that was extremely bad, and it was still producing very close to 4v at WOT at 7000 rpm... but the car was running extremely lean... and I live at 5k feet myself.
The Mass Air Flow sensor measures air mass (hence the name) which means that air density has an effect on the sensor's output - This is what makes it better than a speed density (MAP) system. It can account for the changing air density at differing elevations, temperatures, etc.
The SHO would run very poorly or not at all if the MAF signal was way out of whack - Thats why I said it is pointless to backprobe it. The minute differences involved are not enough that simply stating it should be around 4v at WOT/7000 rpm will provide any real results for Dale. I had a MAF that was extremely bad, and it was still producing very close to 4v at WOT at 7000 rpm... but the car was running extremely lean... and I live at 5k feet myself.