Oil

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

trainguy1989

SHOtarted
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
625
Reaction score
179
Location
Wichita, Ks
Is it alright to switch from Mobile 1 to Castrol GTX if Mobile 1 was used for a while? I ask because I heard it was bad to switch back to dino oil after synthetic has been used for a while.

Thanks,
David
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
My car's original owner had used Mobil 1 since it was new. I bought the car at 150k miles and switched to Castol GTX 10w30 and have been using it ever since. Just recently replaced the valve cover gaskets and everything looked like it was 14k miles instead of 214k miles. Go for it!
 

K-Dawg

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6,063
Reaction score
1,333
Location
Treasure Coast, FL
Yeah, every engine with non-synthetic fails eventually.

David, you should have no problem going back to regular oil. However, I use synthetic because I feel better about going longer between oil changes.
 

nothingtoseehere

SHO Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Messages
2,483
Reaction score
1,192
Its always bad to switch back to Dyno oil because it is an inferior product.

:rofl:

Synthetics advantage is extended change intervals. So if you are using Mobil1 and changing every 3K, you are throwing money away.

****, I use Motorcraft and change every 5K.

You should be fine switching back, as said.
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
Yeah, every engine with non-synthetic fails eventually.
QUOTE]

Well, 215,000 miles and still all-original internals. No tics or knocks. Yep, it's just falling apart!

Seriously, one issue that is often found with synthetics is how it effects seals and gaskets on higher-mileage street engines. I also believe, as a proponent of 3-5k mile oil changes for street engines, that the longevity values of synthetics are negated. Thus the cost vs benefit weighs in the favor of GTX. You also have to understand that, with todays additives, even "conventional" oils are a "synthetic blend".
 

houghton33

New Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Location
Kitchener On, Can.
The superiority of synthetic oil is that it flows much better cold, lubricating all the engine parts better sooner so you don't have dry starts. And for those of us who like to thrash the engine on hot days for hours at a time, synthetic resists thermal break down and maintains stable film strength at extremely high temp. Why do think they put it into the world's most expensive engines?
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
The superiority of synthetic oil is that it flows much better cold, lubricating all the engine parts better sooner so you don't have dry starts. And for those of us who like to thrash the engine on hot days for hours at a time, synthetic resists thermal break down and maintains stable film strength at extremely high temp. Why do think they put it into the world's most expensive engines?

My comments were directed against an oil being used in a street-oriented motor. In street use, even run agrresively, Castrol GTX has all the nessicary additives that provide the stable film strength while resisting thermal break down. It also has additives to provide superior protection during dry-start.

Castrol GTX Key Benefits

•Castrol GTX exceeds demanding U.S. high shear and stay-in-grade requirements for viscosity breakdown protection.
•Far exceeds the demanding U.S. requirements for viscosity breakdown in every grade!
•Engineered to provide maximum protection against viscosity and thermal breakdown!
•Anti-oxidants, detergents and dispersants provide unsurpassed protection against thermal breakdown.
•Exceeds passenger car and gasoline light truck requirements for the protection of gasoline and turbocharged engines where API SM, SL, SJ or SH is recommended.
•Formulated to exceed engine protection requirements of Ford ESE-M2C153-G and F, GM 6085M, Chrysler Corporation MS-6395H.


Product Data Sheet
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
nice cut/paste from their website?

This is simply a statement of the quality basis of the current motor oil specifications. When Mobile 1 first came out, it included additives that were unlike anything else on the market. This was in addition to the synthetic base product. Today most SJ or SH graded oils include those very same additives. It's not that Mobile 1 isn't a high grade product, it's that there just isn't the differentiation between it and the other available products(as there was in the 90's). The major issue to understanding with today's oil products is that there is no longer any pure "Dino oil" products available that meet SH and/or SJ ratings. Everything is, at the minimum, a "blend" today.

As to the "cut/paste" and "Nice commercial" references, I'm sure you would find a completely "non-biased" description on the Mobile 1 site. Also, remember that Castrol also sells synthetic oils. My point is that with a street engine, and using a 3k/5k oil change routine, the cost factor of synthetics out weigh any perceived durability benefits. :thankyou:
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
SH SJ are way outdated specs.

These were the rating levels when the additives we are speaking about started showing up. Look, I'm not trying to tell you not to use Mobile 1. All I am trying to express is the reasons I don't feel the need to do so. Neither of us is wrong, it's just personal preference.:salute:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,196
Members
16,142
Latest member
Kaevorlly

Members online

Back
Top