More front caster

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

SHOZ123

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2000
Messages
12,152
Reaction score
673
Location
Illinois
I wonder if you could take the front control arms, cut 1/2" to 1" out of them and reweld them to get more of a castor angle. Do you think this could be done safely???? :corn:

5877 1
 

nik97

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
129
Location
Mile high
Sounds possible. Of course, there would be a slight compromise to the - camber and track width. Perhaps you could compensate by adding some length to the rear of the arm... A full custom fabricated LCA is somthing I've always been curious about.
 

Ict_Lx

Back in School!
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
232
Reaction score
6
Location
Marietta, Ga
What about cutting out almost all of both of the outer arms and welding an adjustable section in? That way you wouldn't have to be stuck with whatever camber/caster you measured and cut/welded. I wouldn't think that track width would be compromised all that much.
 

dmjarosz

Proud SHO owner
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Location
Hamburg, NY (S. of B'lo)
I def. think its possible to do it. Two things: 1) I'd weld a gusset plate where the arm was cut to add strength, 2) Better make sure you trust whoever is welding them be it yourself or a fab shop. That would be one **** of an expensive accident if that weld broke..
 

Silvapain

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
865
Reaction score
69
Location
Limestone, IL
nik97 said:
Sounds possible. Of course, there would be a slight compromise to the - camber and track width. Perhaps you could compensate by adding some length to the rear of the arm... A full custom fabricated LCA is somthing I've always been curious about.

The camber and track width shouldn't be affected by shifting the lower ball joint mounting point forward.

Paul, rather than massacre an existing LCA, it would be safer to have a new LCA fabricated. I would think that something could be fabbed up with tubing and plate steel, or even better, 4130 or 4340 Chromoly.
 

Porkchop

The Black Sheep
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Messages
1,460
Reaction score
19
Location
Virginia
front adjustable control arms, same idea as the GTP arms but A LOT beefier
 

3.8Lwagon

Shaggen Wagon
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Location
Maryland
i like the idea of a tubeler control arm with sealed ball bearing for the rear mount and a helms joint for the front. having them made would alow you to specify any caster you wanted and would totaly elemanite toe chanes.
of course street driving would suck....but would be sweet at the track.
 

3.8Lwagon

Shaggen Wagon
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Location
Maryland
humm you could even offer the option of gen2 to gen 3 subframe conversions. so the v6s could use the new control arms. ooo i wounder of a tubler subframe could be made....
 

nik97

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
129
Location
Mile high
Silvapain said:
The camber and track width shouldn't be affected by shifting the lower ball joint mounting point forward.

Paul, rather than massacre an existing LCA, it would be safer to have a new LCA fabricated. I would think that something could be fabbed up with tubing and plate steel, or even better, 4130 or 4340 Chromoly.

I sort of assumed Paul was talking about taking some material out of the front of the arm rather than the ball joint boss area. Shortening the front of the arm would pull the ball joint boss foreward and in reducing camber and track width.
I agree with the custom fabricated LCA method too.
 

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
if you want to modify your suspension, download "performance trends suspension analyzer v2.0" and get to work measuring out all the needed suspension points, then run an analysis of the stock system

make changes in the program, then build new adjustable LCA's that match the LCA's in the program
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,195
Members
16,141
Latest member
grapnelg

Members online

Back
Top