Maf before blower?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Lupo

New Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2001
Messages
899
Reaction score
13
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
MYSHO1 said:
Would it be better if i put the MAF before the blower if i run the blower RIGHT next to the intake?


Ideally, it would be best to put both the TB and the MAF before the blower.

In reality, it's whatever you can get working best!:thumb:
 

E1

Crash Tested
Joined
Jan 24, 2003
Messages
784
Reaction score
516
Location
Chicago area
V8 wise, the MAF AFTER the Blower is a nightmare. I did this.

As the Blower spools up it creates variable vortex's in the intake pipe. Think of a drillbit. It has a spiral shape. The vortex created in the intake tube is similar to this. As the Blower output changes, this spiral changes positions. You get the MAF set for Idle and then hammer it, the vortex MOVES and the MAF Freaks out. You CAN'T tune for that very well, In my experiences.

My next blower project has the MAF and Throttle Body in the stock locations, and on the Intake side of the Blower. Should behave much better than Mike B's car did.
 

Axianator

I am a banana!
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Messages
1,372
Reaction score
25
Location
Roanoke, TX
MYSHO1 said:
Would it be better if i put the MAF before the blower if i run the blower RIGHT next to the intake?
Ideally, yes, especially if you're utilizing a draw-through MAF (like the newer 80mm and 90mm Lightning MAFs) that may not take kindly to being placed after the blower in an otherwise blow-through configuration.

I assume the blower in question will be driven by an FPS-style jackshaft?
 

MYSHO1

PiCkLe DaNcE!
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
2
Location
Wakefield Ma, e.p RI
Axianator said:
Ideally, yes, especially if you're utilizing a draw-through MAF (like the newer 80mm and 90mm Lightning MAFs) that may not take kindly to being placed after the blower in an otherwise blow-through configuration.

I assume the blower in question will be driven by an FPS-style jackshaft?

No i have something else kind of in the making...
 

Mr Anonymous

Tire Wall
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
7,317
Reaction score
1,947
Location
St. Louis, MO
FWIW, SCT makes two 90mm MAFs that can be used in either a blow-through or suck-through configuration. They have a OBD2 style connector like the Lightning MAFs, but nothing a pigtail harness won't fix.

The 1453RWHP Ford GT TT runs an SCT BA-2800 MAF in blow-through with no *******.
 

Axianator

I am a banana!
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Messages
1,372
Reaction score
25
Location
Roanoke, TX
Mr Anonymous said:
FWIW, SCT makes two 90mm MAFs that can be used in either a blow-through or suck-through configuration. They have a OBD2 style connector like the Lightning MAFs, but nothing a pigtail harness won't fix.

The 1453RWHP Ford GT TT runs an SCT BA-2800 MAF in blow-through with no *******.
Chris has just brought out an important point which I neglected to address in my original reply, and that is to make sure that you utilize the appropriate MAF type (draw-through or blow-through) for your particular setup. Failure to heed this warning - say, by utilizing a draw-through MAF in a post-blower, blow-through configuration - could result in difficult tunability and other driveability problems.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,197
Members
16,142
Latest member
Kaevorlly

Members online

Back
Top