flow testing the saxacone

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

tqmx1

New Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
119
Reaction score
4
Location
sacramento ca.
This afternoon I was able to flow test the sax and a flushcut back to back. The Sax flowed at 485cfm at 13"h2o, The flush cut flowed a grand total of 460cfm. This is back to back runs 1min apart. This was on a superflow 600 bench.

I guess FoMoGo knew what they were doing when they made the silly thing.

Kim
96 160K
cams welded by the Nor Cal crew
 

nik97

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
129
Location
Mile high
Interesting. I fugured most of it's design was for noise supression. Tho, I have seen a glasspack style Dynomax muffler out flow an equal length and ID straight pipe. -Anyone know the CFM flow of the 3.4?
 

Mr. SHO

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Location
Philadelphia
The 3.4L flows just over 300CFM at OE redline.

I'd like to know the flow figures for the stock airbox with a paper filter vs. a K&N.
 

Funmart6

my name is mud
Joined
Apr 2, 2003
Messages
1,286
Reaction score
116
Location
Auburn, Alabama
What about the "Porter" set up with the 3inch PVc in the fender?

Wonder if the flared end of the "sax" has anything to do with this? I remember things called "velocity stacks" that guys would put on the top of a carb in order to increase air intake.
 

Wess

Jarhead
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
548
Reaction score
0
Location
MD
Damn! Now I wished I hadn't hack-sawed the sax! :rofl:
 

SableOHC

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver
with or without trap

Was the saxocone measurement with or without the trap/insert still in place?
 

SableOHC

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver
Thanks! In that case it looks like there wasn't much point in me pulling out the insert on mine :biggrin: I assume the sax w/o insert would fall in the narrow range measured between sax w/ and cut off.

Oh well, it sounds badder ;)
 

SableOHC

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2003
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver
Mr. SHO said:
What insert? :shrug: Mine never had any inserts.

Inside the cylindrical center part of the "sax" assembly there is another perforated cylinder with holes through the sides. That is what forms the sound baffle. If you separate the two haves of the sax you can pull the inner cylinder out.
 

Mr. SHO

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Location
Philadelphia
It's been a while since I removed the sax, but as far as I could tell at the time, it was one piece. I'll have to dig around the garage and find it and try to see what you mean. I do remember trying to pull it apart though...
 

tqmx1

New Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
119
Reaction score
4
Location
sacramento ca.
And remember tne CFM was measured in " of H2O where measurments for carbs& fi systems are taken in "of HG. So what ever is hung out there is still restrive as heck.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
107,093
Messages
1,181,338
Members
16,157
Latest member
poffffd

Members online

Back
Top