Toolman:
Mikeys_Taurus:
750/ 450 unless something else is requested
Those seem like VERY stiff rates Mike. I am running 600/350, and this is absolutely the stiffest I would want to go. I will be getting softer springs soon, as I think the ride will improve and the Koni's will be better able to damp those rates. I still get some pogo every once in a while.
Keep in mind that unless the coilover design allows the use of very long springs; for example 10" in front and 12" in the rear, the available spring travel is going to be
less then the total suspension travel. IOW, the springs are going to coil bind (become solid objects) before the suspension reaches its normal full bump (compression) travel, and/or they're going to separate from the spring perches when the suspension goes to full droop. Both situations are undesirable.
If you want to lower a SHO by 2.75" and still run long springs to maintain suspension travel, ideally, you would accomplish this by simply turning the lower spring perches to a lower point on their threaded collars, right? Unfortunately, you can't run the perches very far down the strut tube, because they eventually run into the tire.
So, since the strut/tire geometry won't let us do what we really want to, we have to run shorter springs to get the degree of lowering we desire. Running short springs requires that we run very high
spring rates to minimize the possibility that a severe bump will put a spring into coil bind. When a spring is in coil bind,
it has compressed as far as it can go; it becomes a solid piece of metal. Coil bind typically breaks suspension components and/or fractures strut tower sheet metal, it is to be avoided at all costs.
Getting a front and rear Koni insert to a shock dyno has been on my to-do list for several years now. Conversations I had with Koni development people a few years back indicated that the SHO inserts were usable up to ~600 pounds/inch. Beyond that they couldn't say whether there would be sufficient rebound damping to control a higher rate spring. Comments from individuals on this board running high rate springs seem to support this.
<small>[ February 22, 2004, 05:53 PM: Message edited by: Gary M. ]</small>