Caledit missing functionality.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

nc89sho

S13 Sellout
Joined
Feb 27, 2002
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
77
Location
Clemmons NC
as i'm studying more about the caledit stuff. it appears that my x2j.dat file may be outdated, because i am missing control of many of the Pids that are mentioned in most of the tutorials. does anyone have an updated version of this file i can get? Shonut has one but it says that it's for clients only, and i inherited my tweecer, i didn't buy it from them.
 

Lupo

New Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2001
Messages
899
Reaction score
13
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
Even the latest X2J.dat for caledit is very limited, and you won't find a lot of the tutorial stuff.

All the serious tuners are using Binary Editor (100$) along with the Popsracing X2j strategy (80$?). This strategy the most complete and comprehensive by far. I don't think anyone is actively creating or updating the X2J.dat for caledit.

Also, a couple things for X2J in caledit are flat out wrong. The injector low slope for example..
 

nc89sho

S13 Sellout
Joined
Feb 27, 2002
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
77
Location
Clemmons NC
Even the latest X2J.dat for caledit is very limited, and you won't find a lot of the tutorial stuff.

All the serious tuners are using Binary Editor (100$) along with the Popsracing X2j strategy (80$?). This strategy the most complete and comprehensive by far. I don't think anyone is actively creating or updating the X2J.dat for caledit.

Also, a couple things for X2J in caledit are flat out wrong. The injector low slope for example..

i haven't heard this.. explain please?
 

Lupo

New Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2001
Messages
899
Reaction score
13
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
They are not switched. One of them is plain wrong.
The injector low slope (should be the higher number) is wrong in Caledit.
Also I think they also might have switched the labels at some point for certain X2J.dat files. Possibly what SHOspazz92 is talking about.

Stock calibration is:

Low slope: 27.4179 (this is reported cirrectly in Caledit)
Low slope: 29.8846 (There is not a X2J.dat for Caledit that I know of that displays the correct value)
 

nc89sho

S13 Sellout
Joined
Feb 27, 2002
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
77
Location
Clemmons NC
ok, so should i change that value in caledit to the correct one? or just leave it what it comes up as?
 

Lupo

New Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2001
Messages
899
Reaction score
13
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
You can't really change it because the X2J.dat in caledit is looking in the wrong place for that value. It is reading another value, and thinking it's for the low slope.
So this scalar is effectively inaccessible in Caledit.
If you are keeping stock injectors, this isn't something you would change anyways.
If you are using different injectors (i.e bigger), this is an important scalar.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,199
Members
16,142
Latest member
Kaevorlly

Members online

Back
Top