2011 Ford Explorer - built on Taurus/Flex platform

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

EcoBrick Bob

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
253
Location
Clear Lake, IA Naples, Fl
Posted this AM on AutoWeek blog.

Amazing what Ford can do with the same general platform!

Game Changer? Ford has high hopes for its redesigned 2011 Explorer
By WES RAYNAL
The 2011 Ford Explorer is a little wider, a bit lower and will be available with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost four that delivers a projected 237 hp at 5,500 rpm and 250 lb-ft of torque from 1,700 rpm.
The 2011 Ford Explorer is a little wider, a bit lower and will be available with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost four that delivers a projected 237 hp at 5,500 rpm and 250 lb-ft of torque from 1,700 rpm.

Ford - 2011 Ford Explorer

Ford wants you to forget everything you know, or think you know, about its Explorer. The company has high hopes for its all-new SUV, and rightfully so. It's one of the most recognizable nameplates in the auto industry with, according to Ford, a 95 percent name-recognition rate.

The 2011 Explorer is a huge departure from the outgoing model and takes more than a couple of risks. Ford says it will “shatter customers' SUV perceptions” in terms of performance and fuel economy. (According to Ford, fuel economy is the No. 1 reason people say no to SUVs). The company challenged its engineers to make a truck that looks new and fresh inside and out, that will be instantly recognizable as an Explorer, and that not only gets better-than expected fuel economy but combines that with performance and capability people expect from an SUV.

“Our job is to myth-bust,” said group vice president Jim Farley, who is in charge of marketing Fords globally. “Everyone knows the name, but what do they know about it now? So it's my job to change what customers thought Explorer was versus what it has become.”

The truck is a little wider and a wee bit lower, with short overhangs and tucked-in body panels. One of the biggest changes is that the Explorer will be available with a four-cylinder engine. The 2.0-liter EcoBoost four delivers a projected 237 hp at 5,500 rpm and 250 lb-ft of torque from 1,700 rpm.

The standard engine is a 3.5-liter V6 delivering an estimated 290 hp and 255 lb-ft. Both engines are mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. Ford didn't release mpg numbers but said fuel economy should be up 30 percent. The EPA numbers are still pending. Today's Explorer is rated at 14 mpg city/20 mpg highway, so the new four-cylinder's numbers should be around 18 mpg/26 mpg. The V6 can tow 5,000 pounds; the four-cylinder, 2,000 pounds. Ford didn't say officially, but we wouldn't be at all shocked if the 355-hp, 3.5-liter EcoBoost is offered in the not-too-distant future since there's no V8 available.

The V6 is available with an all-wheel-drive system developed with formerly Ford-owned Land Rover, wherein a **** on the center console adjusts among snow, sand, mud and normal modes. Settings adjust engine behavior, throttle tip-in, transmission shifts and calibrations for traction and stability-control systems depending on road conditions. Terrain management includes Hill Descent Control, which brakes the engine to increase control down steep hills. The four-cylinder will be front drive.
The interior of the 2011 Ford Explorer.
Ford

The interior of the 2011 Ford Explorer.

Another departure is that the full frame is gone, replaced by a unibody structure with independent front and rear suspension. The Ford Taurus, the Lincoln MKS and the Ford Flex use the platform, too.

Ford really sweated the details on this baby. It looks clean and modern inside and out, and there's more headroom and shoulder room than before. We tried the third row, and our knees weren't jamming our chins. The interior also features the world's first use of inflatable seatbelts, under development for nearly 10 years, in the second row.

Ford engineers said they targeted Audi in terms of interior quality, switch-gear feel and soft touch points, and they did a good job. In fact, Ford design boss Moray Callum says it's the best interior Ford has done. The gaps are tight, the materials and fit and finish first-rate. We haven't driven the truck yet, but we sat in one, and the front buckets felt comfortable.

“Make it look expensive: That was my goal for the new Explorer interior,” said Mike Arbaugh, interior studio manager. He said he wants the new truck to challenge SUVs such as the BMW X5 and the Audi Q7, “so the interior design, craftsmanship and fit and finish should play in that league.”

Base, XLT and Limited trim levels will be available when the Explorer goes on sale this winter; there's no Eddie Bauer version yet. XLT and Limited models will have MyFord Touch technology with two driver-configurable LCD screens, an eight-inch color touch screen in the center stack, an expanded media hub with USB ports, an SD card reader, RCA video input jacks and Ford Sync.

No prices have been set yet but we'd guess the MSRP will be in line with today's Explorer, which starts at $29,280.

For more Car news - Automotive Headlines, click here.

Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20100726/CARNEWS/307269999#ixzz0unrfqe8b
 

OldSalt

Floor It!!
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
84
Reaction score
16
Location
Norfolk, Virginia
Unless you're into extreme off roading the unibody is a perfect choice, 99% of consumers don't and can't tell the difference. It's stiffer than the older frame-on construction of old so what is the down side, better ride, better chassis rigidity, superior handling, Ford nails it again. If you wanna tow something heavy buy a truck! My guess is that only 5% ever go offroad with intent anyway the rest just provide a safer ride in inclement weather for families and in that role this SUV will excel. Great Job Ford!
 

SpAz

New Member
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
130
Reaction score
36
Location
Colorado
I'm just happy to see that Ford is the only US automaker that isn't stagnant. At least they're pushing new things out and being inventive.

The new exploder kind of looks like a crossover. I'll have to check one out when they get to the lot.
 

SeanMc

NoMoSHO
Joined
Feb 20, 2005
Messages
4,120
Reaction score
731
Location
Location: Location:
I don't mind it being on the Taurus/Flex platform, what bothers me is that it's either FWD or AWD. If it was RWD or AWD, I would be much happier.
 

hawkeye18

Sorta cares
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
5,631
Reaction score
2,727
Location
Norfolk, VA
I don't mind it being on the Taurus/Flex platform, what bothers me is that it's either FWD or AWD. If it was RWD or AWD, I would be much happier.

I would not want a full-size SUV to be based on the same platform as my car.
 

esfoad

Esfoad
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
270
Reaction score
30
Location
New Jersey
In V6 form it is rated to tow 5000Lbs. That should satisfy those who are worried. As stated previously, if you need more then you always have the option of buying an Expedition or an F150.
 

RonPorter

SHO Club of America
Joined
Feb 25, 2001
Messages
3,722
Reaction score
2,572
Location
Lake Orion, MI
Unless you're into extreme off roading the unibody is a perfect choice, 99% of consumers don't and can't tell the difference. It's stiffer than the older frame-on construction of old so what is the down side, better ride, better chassis rigidity, superior handling, Ford nails it again. If you wanna tow something heavy buy a truck! My guess is that only 5% ever go offroad with intent anyway the rest just provide a safer ride in inclement weather for families and in that role this SUV will excel. Great Job Ford!

Yep, I think it looks great!

And the 5,000# towing will cover 90% of what most folks need. Most consumers wouldn't know what a ladder frame or a unibody are.

Getting into the >5,000# towing has been better with a truck anyway. Get an F-Series crew cab for that. Most folks just want the interior space and people-carrying capability.
 

hawkeye18

Sorta cares
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
5,631
Reaction score
2,727
Location
Norfolk, VA
Yep, I think it looks great!

And the 5,000# towing will cover 90% of what most folks need. Most consumers wouldn't know what a ladder frame or a unibody are.

Getting into the >5,000# towing has been better with a truck anyway. Get an F-Series crew cab for that. Most folks just want the interior space and people-carrying capability.

Just out of curiosity, what is the new SHO rated to tow? I know the Gen 1/2 MTX was rated for 1,000lbs and the ATX was rated for diddly squat. I should think the new ones would be at least that, maybe even 2,000lbs.
 

thebigjimsho

LSA = YUM
Joined
Dec 25, 2001
Messages
2,558
Reaction score
1,261
Location
Worcester, MA, USA
Unless you're into extreme off roading the unibody is a perfect choice, 99% of consumers don't and can't tell the difference. It's stiffer than the older frame-on construction of old so what is the down side, better ride, better chassis rigidity, superior handling, Ford nails it again. If you wanna tow something heavy buy a truck! My guess is that only 5% ever go offroad with intent anyway the rest just provide a safer ride in inclement weather for families and in that role this SUV will excel. Great Job Ford!

I'm just happy to see that Ford is the only US automaker that isn't stagnant. At least they're pushing new things out and being inventive.

The new exploder kind of looks like a crossover. I'll have to check one out when they get to the lot.

Ford nails it again, just like Jeep and GM already did...

As for only Ford not being stagnant, how long did it take them to get a high performance sports sedan back on the road?
 

shobote

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
207
Location
Naperville, IL
Looks like a huge improvement with the unibody design; body on frame is old school, as the Jeep Grand Cherokee is one of the best off road SUV's, particulaly the new 2011, and Jeep has been using unibody since 2005. Just wHy is the 2.0 4 cylinder ecoboost in this huge heavy thing instead of the 3.5 which fits the same platform ? I was considering one until it was announced that no 3.5 TT is available. the v6 will be lucky to break 8 sec. to 60 with all that weight.
 

EcoBrick Bob

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
253
Location
Clear Lake, IA Naples, Fl
As for towing, EB Flex would tow higher weights but radiator opening/radiator limit towing capacity to 4,500. With a bigger radiator ($599. + install) it should tow as much as new Explorer, and with better acceleration. Would guess that radiator & frontal area may be a restriction for SHO.

Here is a nice article on EcoBoost Flex posted on AutoWeek website today, if anyone is interested.


The 2010 Ford Flex Limited EcoBoost, an AW Drivers Log

As-Tested Price: $46,020

Drivetrain: 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V6; AWD, six-speed automatic

Output: 355 hp @ 5,700 rpm, 350 lb-ft @ 3,500 rpm

Curb Weight: 4,839 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 18/18.3 mpg

Options: Panoramic vista roof ($1,495); rapid spec package including 20-inch wheels, all-season tires ($795); active park assist ($550); white two-tone roof ($395)

Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20100727/CARREVIEWS/100729873#ixzz0uv8vW9MC
 

SpAz

New Member
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
130
Reaction score
36
Location
Colorado
Chrysler 300C in 2005?

Same year that Ford released it's new mustang that sparked the other auto companies to bring back the retro look?

Wasn't the 10 year span that ford left the "high performance sedan" market also accompanied by them dominating in other markets (mainly truck sales-as always)?

Lets not forget that this same period also kept them from being purchased by the US Government. (Unlike who?)

I also could have argued that Ford owned Jaguar at that time thus they had several high performance sedans on the road but that wasn't my overall point.

My point was that Ford has been (imo) the most successful and inventive US Auto-Company as of late.
 
Last edited:

zeus268

Maple Leaf SHO
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
396
Reaction score
53
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
Same year that Ford released it's new mustang that sparked the other auto companies to bring back the retro look?

Wasn't the 10 year span that ford left the "high performance sedan" market also accompanied by them dominating in other parts of the market (mainly truck sales-as always)?

That same period also kept them from being purchased by the US government.

I also could have argued that Ford owned Jaguar at that time thus they had several high performance sedans on the road but that wasn't my overall point.

My point was that Ford has been (imo) the most successfu and inventive US Auto-Company as of late.

You are right about what Ford is doing lately but back in 2005, Chrysler made a great comeback with the Chrysler 300 and 300C. Since then they've lost all that footing to Chev and Ford...... Of all the domestic companies, Ford is by far the most exciting RIGHT NOW with their current product offering. ****, I've never owned a Ford before the SHO! But until the SHO, their offerings in the "performance sedan" market were just not there...... Also, in regards to their truck sales.... the only reason for that is the cheap offerings to the fleet market. The Dodge Ram is a far superior truck in every way.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
107,089
Messages
1,181,322
Members
16,155
Latest member
crystizel

Members online

Back
Top