RedCandySHO
Canuck SHO 2
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/10/spy-shots-2012-ford-taurus-sho-spotted-in-the-wild-are-there/
Tailpipe tips look a little different....
Tailpipe tips look a little different....
Last edited:
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Different headlights?
Doubt it. Thats a pretty expensive change, and the Taurus has only been out two years. They could change them from chrome to brushed or something darker but I cant see them changing the whole housing.
I like the wheels.
I'd like to see the 2012 have better brakes as the article mentions. 400 HP from the factory would be great as well.
Agreed. Whenever I apply the brakes on my 2010, there is a serious "lack of confidence" feeling. Most of the Taurus's I have seen that have been in accidents have front end damage....that usually means to much texting, or a braking problem.
The number of people who tailgate is getting atrocious and extremely dangerous.

Boy, amen, I agree with you. It's funny how many people feel the brakes are lacking in the SHO. After driving a Ford truck for over 10 years, again I think the brakes are a BIG step up from the truck. However, I will temper this statement that I really haven't driven anything performance oriented in many years to compare with the SHO. I still think the brakes are much better then the last of the Crown Vics I drove as cruisers before I retired.![]()
Did this get moved? Repost...
In daily driving the brakes on the SHO, even without the performance pack are ok. Any aggressive driving and they go to crap fast.
To the New Generation crowds; don't flame me, but not having the ordinary stick shift makes it not that appealing on these new SHOs. Plus they jack up the price as if they are trying to sell some luxury vehicle or something. Am I missing something here? Did our real SHO Enthusiasts change the way they want from the SHOs or many of you just get rich from this economy? :braincramp: