GEN 3 SHO FAN
SHO Member
Since I saw a beautiful '94 RM Mark VIII, I turned my attention to this car by curiosity. 
Their 4.6L engine use a 80mm MAF too. But according to an enthousiam site, this engine used 3 differents MAF between 93 and 98... More precisely, there are 3 identicals MAF but they use different transfert fonction chart. If I compare 93-95 vs 96 MAF transfert fonction, the 96 will send a little bit less voltage for the same amount of air.
Correct me guys, but looking at these, my deduction is :
- olders will do richer ratio
- newer will do leaner ratio
It seems that we are able to modify by a little bit the air/ratio when replacing with a different part number 80mm MAF. (!?) Each are calibrated for their ECU.
https://mark8.site/mark-viii-featured-tech-and-schematics.html
(see "Mark VIII specific" section)
I put here some notes to see if part numbers could help understand.
Mark VIII :
- 93-95 : F3VF-12B579-AA
- 96 : F5OF-12B579-AA
- 97-98 : F8LZ-12B579-AA
(Also, according to cross numbers on Rockauto, 97-98 Mark can take the F5OF-12B579-A.)
SHO :
- 96-97 : F5OF-12B579-AA
- 98-99 : I'm not considering the plastic MAF here (F81F-12B579-BA / XL3F-12B579-BA)
F-150 (Triton engines) :
- 97-98 : F5OF-12B579-AA
I found this one on too :
-97-98 : F8LF-12B579-AA (presently on my SHO...humm, is my a/f ratio is good, too lean ?)
I tryed to compare with our tranfert chart on V8SHO site but the measurements were taken differently. If someone know more about that, I will be interested to learn.
https://forums.corral.net/threads/can-i-use-a-maf-from-a-lincoln-mark-8-on-my-fox-5-0.1195688/
https://www.corral.net/threads/used...nterchange-on-different-ford-vehicles.986360/
https://www.corral.net/threads/junkyard-horsepower-summary.1092402/
Their 4.6L engine use a 80mm MAF too. But according to an enthousiam site, this engine used 3 differents MAF between 93 and 98... More precisely, there are 3 identicals MAF but they use different transfert fonction chart. If I compare 93-95 vs 96 MAF transfert fonction, the 96 will send a little bit less voltage for the same amount of air.
Correct me guys, but looking at these, my deduction is :
- olders will do richer ratio
- newer will do leaner ratio
It seems that we are able to modify by a little bit the air/ratio when replacing with a different part number 80mm MAF. (!?) Each are calibrated for their ECU.
https://mark8.site/mark-viii-featured-tech-and-schematics.html
(see "Mark VIII specific" section)
I put here some notes to see if part numbers could help understand.
Mark VIII :
- 93-95 : F3VF-12B579-AA
- 96 : F5OF-12B579-AA
- 97-98 : F8LZ-12B579-AA
(Also, according to cross numbers on Rockauto, 97-98 Mark can take the F5OF-12B579-A.)
SHO :
- 96-97 : F5OF-12B579-AA
- 98-99 : I'm not considering the plastic MAF here (F81F-12B579-BA / XL3F-12B579-BA)
F-150 (Triton engines) :
- 97-98 : F5OF-12B579-AA
I found this one on too :
-97-98 : F8LF-12B579-AA (presently on my SHO...humm, is my a/f ratio is good, too lean ?)
I tryed to compare with our tranfert chart on V8SHO site but the measurements were taken differently. If someone know more about that, I will be interested to learn.
https://forums.corral.net/threads/can-i-use-a-maf-from-a-lincoln-mark-8-on-my-fox-5-0.1195688/
https://www.corral.net/threads/used...nterchange-on-different-ford-vehicles.986360/
https://www.corral.net/threads/junkyard-horsepower-summary.1092402/
Last edited:


