Radiator Ducting.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

SHOspazz92

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
6,952
Reaction score
3,672
Location
Triad Area, North Carolina.
With the Temps being so high in NC at this time of the year, I'm really hoping that heat wont be a problem. Not for the FMIC on the S/C SHO, but the radiator. My concern is that the FMIC is blocking a lot of air flow to the Radiator and the A/C condenser. Case in point, The A/C when first turned on will blow cool if the car is not hot (I.E., Just starting it up). However once you have driven it for a while, the A/C will no longer blow cold. I'm also sure that water temps are up as well.

So, In the future when I get home I am considering making up some ducting that will flow directly to the radiator and possibly adding a additional fan (on a switch) to aid with low speed/idle temps during the summer. Anyone have some thoughts or suggestions about this? Gary M? Tyner?

-Sam
 

rubydist

SHO Master
Staff member
Super Moderators
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
7,521
Reaction score
3,399
Location
Denver
do you have room for a pusher fan in front of the ic/condensor?
 

SASHO91

Zoom Zoom
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
6,990
Reaction score
141
Location
San Antonio,TX
Hey Sam, it may be worthwhile to just give them a good cleaning(if that hasnt been done yet). Granted, ducting the raditator would be ideal considering the amount of core volume you have out front there....
 

92sho16

b00sted
Joined
Jan 19, 2003
Messages
1,109
Reaction score
134
Location
Liverpool, NY
At watkins glen in august (mid 90's ambient) i ran decent temperatures on the track by lowering my fan turn on to 204 iirc down from 216. I also lowered the the turn off to 188 down from 192. I contemplated making police grille type cutouts in the bumper.
 

SHOspazz92

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
6,952
Reaction score
3,672
Location
Triad Area, North Carolina.
At watkins glen in august (mid 90's ambient) i ran decent temperatures on the track by lowering my fan turn on to 204 iirc down from 216. I also lowered the the turn off to 188 down from 192. I contemplated making police grille type cutouts in the bumper.

Unfortunently, any kind of "Cutout" in the bumper will not do my car any good, as the FMIC is going to block whatever airflow could be channeled to the radiator. I think I'm going to have to have some sort of ducting fabricated. The ducting, Will be attached to a belly pan that runs from the radiator support to the edge of the front bumper, making sure air does not escape elsewhere, and goes to the radiator. I kind of drew somthing up (You can see it grey, in the attachment) on how I want to do this. Obviously, I would not want the ducting hanging so low.

I'll figure somthing out, it shouldn't be to hard.

-Sam
 

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
The best first step would be to have a piece of steel rectangular tubing rolled to the same diameter as the factory front bumper reinforcement. This will allow MUCH more air to roll up over the top of the intercooler into the radiator.
 

Off Road SHO

Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
1,292
Location
Arizona
Any air flow over about 20 mph through the radiator is wasted, and not needed. The radiator in SHO's are way more capable of tranfering enough heat energy out of coolant than is needed. Just make sure you have a clean radiator as was mentioned above and coolant flow and airflow.

We used to use steel washers instead of thermostats to neck down the coolant flow in our off road cars. Got rid of a failure point and slowed down the coolant so it would absorb more heat from the engine. The coolant had no problem getting rid of the heat quickly through the thin walls of the radiator.

Tom
 

SHOZ123

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2000
Messages
12,152
Reaction score
673
Location
Illinois
You could try taking the low speed fan resistor connector off and jumpering it. This will make the lo speed fan run at hi speed.
 

firebat45

SHO Member
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
869
Reaction score
472
Location
Edmonton
Juat ? please tell me this isn't the old hotrodder idea that if water moves to fast through an engine it cant absorb heat.

There is a point where having the water moving quicker hurts performance, instead of helping it. Not sure if that point is ever relevant on a SHO, but the theory is hydrodunamically sound, at least.

You can also pump it through the rad too fast to transfer heat out of it. People seem a lot more willing to accept that idea, even though it's the same concept.

As for the original question, the intercooler shouldn't block flow. If no air flows through it, it won't be doing anything. It also shouldn't be heating the air up enough to cause a problem for the radiator. I'd check to make sure it's not clogged up, or mounted at a wierd angle.

What I bet is happening is that the majority of the air is tumbling around the edges of the intercooler and missing the radiator. If you duct between the intercooler and the rad, so no air escapes, and in front of the intercooler, I bet you will see a large drop in engine and intake temperatures.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
4,970
Reaction score
1,456
Location
Cocoa,Florida
It's tough to say due to the fact of the gen 2 having a lack of openings in the bumper.
The IC core in my gen 1 is something like 24 long 10 tall and 2.5 thick.
It is enough to cover the lower opening in the bumper but leaves the upper openings clear.

I would pull the radiator and try cleaning it out first.
I've seen them packed with dirt,bugs,ext...
 

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
You can also pump it through the rad too fast to transfer heat out of it. People seem a lot more willing to accept that idea, even though it's the same concept.

Heres my problem with that idea, no matter how fast you push coolant through the radiator, it will always spend 45% of its time in the engine, 45% of its time in the radiator, and the other 10% in the hoses and pump. (guesstimates)

time = heat transfer, weather its 100* drop in one pass or 10* drop on each of ten passes.
 

SHO Continental

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
2,111
Reaction score
501
Location
Northridge, Cali
Heres my problem with that idea, no matter how fast you push coolant through the radiator, it will always spend 45% of its time in the engine, 45% of its time in the radiator, and the other 10% in the hoses and pump. (guesstimates)

time = heat transfer, weather its 100* drop in one pass or 10* drop on each of ten passes.

If that were true we wouldn't need thermostats to regulate the time the coolant spends in the motor.
 

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
If that were true we wouldn't need thermostats to regulate the time the coolant spends in the motor.

so you disagree with the statement "time = heat transfer, weather its 100* drop in one pass or 10* drop on each of ten passes." ?

We need Tstats because the heat output of the engine varies depending on speed and load so we cant just drive the pump at a certain speed at all times and expect the cooling system to work perfect
 

rubydist

SHO Master
Staff member
Super Moderators
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
7,521
Reaction score
3,399
Location
Denver
10* drop in each of ten passes will take much more power to pump the water.

also, as the water moves faster, the heat transfer rate goes down, because of turbulence, etc. so the comparison is likely more like 100* drop in one pass, or 45* drop in each of 2 passes, or 7* drop in each of 10 passes.

at some point, the water won't pick up enough heat from the engine to carry it out and keep the engine cool.
 

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
10* drop in each of ten passes will take much more power to pump the water.

yep, wasn't suggesting anyone actually try to spin their pump that fast, it was just typed that way for the sake of making a point

because of turbulence,

Turbulance actually improves heat transfer
Turbulator


Turbulence impedes flow, not heat transfer
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,195
Members
16,141
Latest member
grapnelg

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top