New rear springs...still SAS

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

skalor

New Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Location
Lehigh Valley, PA
I replaced the rear springs, struts, strut mounts, and swaybar end links but the rear end is still saggy. I got the rear springs from Autozone, I believe they were 839s. Struts were cheap Gabriel's from Rockauto. Any ideas on why the rear suspension is still so low?

IMAG0112.jpg
 
Last edited:

SHOVNST

Blood type: SHO+
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
823
Reaction score
404
Location
Niwot, CO
Is the current height the same as before with the previous (I assume factory original) springs? You might have the wrong springs. Not much else would cause that low of a height. What is the rear tire size? They look small(er) in the picture.
 

LOUDSHO92

SHO Master
Staff member
Club Mod
Sponsoring Vendor
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Messages
5,550
Reaction score
1,042
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
You may have the wrong struts or springs. Post up the part numbers.

Dod you use a new rear strut mount?
 

SHOdded

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
9,045
Reaction score
4,390
Location
Maryland
I believe these are the AZ springs being used for the rearend. They seem to be showing the same part number for the SLO sedan as well.
 

skalor

New Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Location
Lehigh Valley, PA
It's pretty much the exact same height as the old stuff. I put on new strut mounts as well since the passenger side was bad.

Springs are from Autozone - RCS839V
Struts are from Rockauto - Gabriel G67518
 

skalor

New Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Location
Lehigh Valley, PA
Is the current height the same as before with the previous (I assume factory original) springs? You might have the wrong springs. Not much else would cause that low of a height. What is the rear tire size? They look small(er) in the picture.
All tires are 215/60/16, I just checked. Keep in mind, I bought this car in May with a bad clutch and I finally just got it on the road. I double checked the box and they are the correct part number. I guess it's possible the springs were wrong in the box.
 
Last edited:

RonPorter

SHO Club of America
Joined
Feb 25, 2001
Messages
3,722
Reaction score
2,572
Location
Lake Orion, MI
That would make it sit that low? I could understand them causing a softer ride but I just don't believe it could cause it to lower that much.

I would say yes. The same problem existed when folks put the Roush SLO springs on their Gen 1-2, or the gen 3 SLO Eibach springs on a Gen 3 SHO.
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
Unless you change the strut mounting points, struts don't effect height. The coils are the only item(in a stock suspension configuration) that changes height. :salute:
 

skalor

New Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Location
Lehigh Valley, PA
I would say yes. The same problem existed when folks put the Roush SLO springs on their Gen 1-2, or the gen 3 SLO Eibach springs on a Gen 3 SHO.

So what is the correct part number then because every search I've done states that 839s are fine to run.
 

RonPorter

SHO Club of America
Joined
Feb 25, 2001
Messages
3,722
Reaction score
2,572
Location
Lake Orion, MI
So what is the correct part number then because every search I've done states that 839s are fine to run.

Nothing from AZ. If you don't go with Eibach or Intrax, go with the Moog springs. A search of the forum should give you a lot of info. And IIRC they aren't very expensive.
 

skalor

New Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
11
Reaction score
4
Location
Lehigh Valley, PA
Nothing from AZ. If you don't go with Eibach or Intrax, go with the Moog springs. A search of the forum should give you a lot of info. And IIRC they aren't very expensive.
I'm pretty sure these are Moog springs. Gen 1 Moogs are CC839 And these are RCS839V with CC839 listed as an alternate part number.
 

RonPorter

SHO Club of America
Joined
Feb 25, 2001
Messages
3,722
Reaction score
2,572
Location
Lake Orion, MI
I'm pretty sure these are Moog springs. Gen 1 Moogs are CC839 And these are RCS839V with CC839 listed as an alternate part number.

SHO guys go with the Moog Cargo Coils, and sometimes cut a coil or two, as they make the car sit too high.

Moog makes all kinds of parts for many cars. Again, do a search here on the forum for the Moog springs the guys use. Never used them myself, only Eibach and now B&Gs on my Tokicos.
 

DJSHO91

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
809
Location
Durham, NC
I'm pretty sure these are Moog springs. Gen 1 Moogs are CC839 And these are RCS839V with CC839 listed as an alternate part number.

Many companies use the Moog springs part#s as reference for their springs. This doesn't mean that they are the same construction and specifications. The same thing happens with Fram filters and Monroe shocks. :salute:
 

SHOspazz92

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
6,952
Reaction score
3,672
Location
Triad Area, North Carolina.
SHO guys go with the Moog Cargo Coils, and sometimes cut a coil or two, as they make the car sit too high.

Moog makes all kinds of parts for many cars. Again, do a search here on the forum for the Moog springs the guys use. Never used them myself, only Eibach and now B&Gs on my Tokicos.

I used Moog cargo coils with Tokico's on my 89:

23753_322323813213_8254146_n.jpg


The car did not suffer from SAS with that setup and rode incredible. I miss that car!

-Sam
 

shobote

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
207
Location
Naperville, IL
It is due to the wrong springs for sure. Autozone has a bunch of listings for wrong parts and I would never buy anything other than fluids, expendibles from them; they also list the wrong OEM Champion spark plugs for my Hemi, and also list platinum and iridium plugs, none of which work, as the 5.7 requires copper plugs.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,088
Messages
1,181,320
Members
16,154
Latest member
dan.delargy

Members online

Back
Top