Intake Q

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

99SHOtime

99SHOtime
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Location
Kansas
Which allows more air to the engine?

A) Removing the saxacone from the stock intake

B) Buying a cold air intake cone
 

zach44102

BIG TURBO
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,651
Location
Georgia
a) a cone only helps when put into the fender. otherwise a cone inplace of the airbox is a downgrade. but im the one to talk i have a cone intake system
 

zach44102

BIG TURBO
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,651
Location
Georgia
oops.. sorry but i think it would still have the same effect. i had a gen3 once but it had cam failure. got the broken cam welded but too scared to crank because the timing is off.
 

zblackbeast

SHOtarded
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
2,632
Reaction score
374
Location
Omaha, NE
Hes talking about the cones inside the intake.. correct?

Also, unless you can get one that draws from the fender like Zach stated, a drop in K&N filter should be more than enough for a stock motor. On a V8 you can disconnect the secondaries and take out those velocity stacks.
 

SuperHO

Mental Patient
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
5,696
Reaction score
1,370
Location
St. Joe, MI
technically, the sax IS a cold air intake...damn shame it's the size of a vienna sausage. yank off the restrictive portion of the saxocone and call it happy. oh yeah...yank your secondaries while you're at it.
 

99SHOtime

99SHOtime
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Location
Kansas
Thank you for the feed back.

Yeah im talking about the restrictor inside the stock intake and just a regular k&n cone.

Btw..secondaries are gutted.
 

dranniK

New Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
Granite City, Illinois
technically, the sax IS a cold air intake...damn shame it's the size of a vienna sausage. yank off the restrictive portion of the saxocone and call it happy. oh yeah...yank your secondaries while you're at it.

Sorry.. I have a feeling this might be a dumb question but I really don't know the answer, but whats the point in pulling the secondaries?
 

Izzmo

SHO Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
51
Location
Kansas City, KS
Sorry.. I have a feeling this might be a dumb question but I really don't know the answer, but whats the point in pulling the secondaries?
I don't know if we have all come to a consensus or not on this as a whole group, but if you ask me it's not a problem with the secondaries themselves but the problems caused by having it.

Most people see a failure in the IMRC motor (which opens and closes the secondary butterflies inside the lower intake manifold (LIM)) because of carbon buildup on the secondary plates which does not allow them to open and thus either burning out the motor or splicing the cable. So, instead of replacing/repairing the IMRC, they just either wire open the secondaries or gut them completely.

I have personally gutted mine and it allows for a little better sound because more air is getting into the cylinders at any time below 3400 RPM's which I believe allows for a better take off (to a degree). To take any effects of removing the secondaries, you must have a tune though.
 

SuperHO

Mental Patient
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
5,696
Reaction score
1,370
Location
St. Joe, MI
mine's not tuned, and it's been pullin just fine without secondaries for over a year now. the thing is, the secondaries on the V6 intake open a completely different set of runners. on a V8, they pretty much block off one intake valve for whatever stupid reason. basically, the V8 SHO is a 3 valve engine until 3400rpm, and gutting the secondaries solves that problem.
 

Ian Macoomb

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
100
Location
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
mine's not tuned, and it's been pullin just fine without secondaries for over a year now. the thing is, the secondaries on the V6 intake open a completely different set of runners. on a V8, they pretty much block off one intake valve for whatever stupid reason. basically, the V8 SHO is a 3 valve engine until 3400rpm, and gutting the secondaries solves that problem.

But nobody has proven this on a drag strip. Bring me 14 second slips and I believe that the secondaries aren't useful.
 

stephen newberg

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2001
Messages
3,370
Reaction score
398
Location
Ladysmith, BC, Canada
Much appreciated! I was always curious but hesitant to look dumb and ask.

Remember when you were told as a kid in grade school there was no such thing as a dumb question? They were right. Ask away and never worry about it, though as noted by another poster, sometimes a search will get you an answer more quickly.

pax, smn
 

Izzmo

SHO Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
51
Location
Kansas City, KS
I don't want to get this into another secondary thread (we haven't had one in a while though), considering this isn't even what the topic is about.. but I don't believe Ford is that stupid to make secondaries not useful at all. When talking about this kind of stuff, you have to keep in mind the actual intentions of the engineers. They didn't have performance in mind (at least for the most part), but instead had economy with the ability for that extra kick if needed, which is where the secondaries came in.

I have heard from multiple people, and it only makes sense, that gutting/wiring open the secondaries won't help you performance wise without a tune simply because your tables need to be recalibrated for the extra air in the system before 3400 RPM. Correct me if I am wrong though.
 

SuperHO

Mental Patient
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
5,696
Reaction score
1,370
Location
St. Joe, MI
while you may not get FULL benefits without a tune, our ECUs are adaptive and capable of adjusting for the addition of more air into the engine.
 

shooff82

SHOOFF82
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
94
Reaction score
9
Location
Hutchinson, Kansas
I thought the biggest reasons for the secondaries is fuel economy and to keep the port velocity up to help with low end torque. Especially since we're talking about small displacement, normally aspirated engines. I also thought that was the point of the velocity stacks in the surge tanks and the difference in runner lengths.
 

SHOZ123

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2000
Messages
12,152
Reaction score
673
Location
Illinois
You don't want to take out the internal horns as they do extend the external runners to a uniform length.

On the V8 there is a small advantage to keeping the secondary plates for economy or driveability. Keeping it working correctly can be a pain though and is why I took mine out.
 

shooff82

SHOOFF82
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
94
Reaction score
9
Location
Hutchinson, Kansas
I thought the biggest reasons for the secondaries is fuel economy and to keep the port velocity up to help with low end torque. Especially since we're talking about small displacement, normally aspirated engines. I also thought that was the point of the velocity stacks in the surge tanks and the difference in runner lengths.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,199
Members
16,142
Latest member
Kaevorlly

Members online

Back
Top