How can I eliminate the following...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
I am doing a project that is using the 3.4 in another vehicle, and I don't need and would like to remove/eliminate both the power steering pump and the AC compressor. Any suggestions on how to deal with the serpentine belt without the above mentioned items? I suppose I could create "dummy" idler pullies and mount them in their place, but the whole idea is to get the engine as cleaned up as possible.
 

SuperHO

Mental Patient
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
5,696
Reaction score
1,370
Location
St. Joe, MI
Find a shorter belt? I don't know if the A/C compressor's structual like it is on the V6, but I think sourcing a shorter belt, possibly going with slightly different routing, would be your best bet.


Now that that silly shit's out of the way, what are you swapping it into, and where's the pics????
 

Johnlemon

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
104
Reaction score
165
Location
Glendale, Arizona
on the v8 the ac compressor pulley is on the far right (3), power steering pump is 1
drivebelt.jpg


reroute a shorter belt from the crankshaft pulley over (instead of under) the idler pulley, and hopefully it'll have enough grip on it
 
Last edited:

luigisho

SHO Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2001
Messages
13,266
Reaction score
5,143
Location
va beach,va
Like was stated, if you remove those items you take some string around the revised belt path and find a belt for the new length. Hopefully you will get enough tension to make it work.
 

Mr Anonymous

Tire Wall
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
7,317
Reaction score
1,947
Location
St. Louis, MO
like this
drivebelt2.jpg
That won't work because the tensioner tensions in the other direction.

The A/C compressor can be completely removed and bypassed (I've done it).

The P/S pump you can probably do it but you may need to go with a larger or smaller pulley on one of the three idlers in order to resolve any clearance issues. You can run the ribbed side of the belt on the smooth idlers no problem as well (again, something I did when I bypassed the A/C).
 

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
OK, thanks for all the input. Which of 2,6,8 & 9 are idlers only, and which are idlers/tensioners? I ask because the routing would change the rotation...So Mr A. what would be your recommendation?
 
Last edited:

bacernate

97 MONEY PIT
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
242
Reaction score
7
Location
Denver, Colorado
You might check into some idlers off a vw, they are ribbed on both sides as are the belts. So no smooth side would have it's benefits.
 

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
OK, how about this routing....starting at the crankshaft pulley #5 (wrapped normally),
traveling counter-clockwise to idler pulley #2 (wrapped opposite normal, over the top), traveling to idler pulley #8 (wrapped opposite normal, over the top),
traveling to alternator pulley #7 (wrapped normally),
traveling to tensioner pulley #6 (wrapped normally),
traveling to idler pulley #9 (wrapped normally),
traveling back to the crankshaft pulley #5.
Remove/eliminate the ac compressor #3 and the power steering pump #1.
Tensioner would work normally.
Johnlemmon, could you update your drawing to reflect? Any comments?
 

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
Find a shorter belt? I don't know if the A/C compressor's structual like it is on the V6, but I think sourcing a shorter belt, possibly going with slightly different routing, would be your best bet.


Now that that silly shit's out of the way, what are you swapping it into, and where's the pics????

OK, I am documenting the build, I will be posting pics when I am a bit farther along. The tentative project name is "Frankentruck" and will consist of the following:

1953 F100 pickup body, stretched 10" longitudinally. This required two truck cabs and sets of doors to accomplish. Front suspension will be a lowered mustang II style IFS with air bags and manual rack. Frame will be custom fabricated using 2 x 6 rec tube.

The Gen3 V8 engine/transmission/subframe will be installed IN THE REAR, ala Porsche, yielding a IRS. The steering rack will be removed and the steering link arms pinned to the frame via heim joints. The struts will also be removed and replaced with upper A-arms. The stock lower arms/links will be retained. the rear will be suspended/sprung via a pushrod system to remote air spring/shocks. Because the front end will now be so light, a manual steering rack is sufficient, thus the desire to eliminate the PS pump. AC? who needs AC!!!! getting rid of the AC compressor too.

I'm still up in the air on whether to put the radiator in the front of the truck or in the bed/engine area. More to come....
 

Mr Anonymous

Tire Wall
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
7,317
Reaction score
1,947
Location
St. Louis, MO
Without having a motor in front of me I suspect you're going to have to go with larger pullies on idlers 8 and 2, and/or a smaller pulley on idler 9. The problem I see is that they are so close to being in the same plane that once you start trying to pass a belt by in close proximity they're going to touch. Next time I'm at the shop I'll see if I can mock something up and take a picture.
 

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
OK, how about this routing....starting at the crankshaft pulley #5 (wrapped normally),
traveling counter-clockwise to idler pulley #2 (wrapped opposite normal, over the top), traveling to idler pulley #8 (wrapped opposite normal, over the top),
traveling to alternator pulley #7 (wrapped normally),
traveling to tensioner pulley #6 (wrapped normally),
traveling to idler pulley #9 (wrapped normally),
traveling back to the crankshaft pulley #5.
Remove/eliminate the ac compressor #3 and the power steering pump #1.
Tensioner would work normally.
Johnlemmon, could you update your drawing to reflect? Any comments?

Well, there is good news. I have the engine/trans/subframe out of the vehicle, so it is pretty easy to check the belt routing options. What I discovered is that the flat-surface idler pullies and the grooved tensioner pulley are directly interchangeable...same centerline, same bearings. Also, the #2 & #8 idler pulleys are located sufficently above the #9 center idler that there would be no interference between the belt as they pass near each other in this routing scheme. So what I have done is order two grooved tensioner/idler pullies from autopartswarehouse.com to replace the two upper smooth idlers, which will allow having the belt grooves riding in a grooved pulley in those two locations. This should guarantee good belt tracking and improve belt life. All that remains is to recieve and install these two pulleys, and then try to determine a correct belt length. I have already stripped off the PS pump and the AC compressor, which cleans up the engine nicely. Those perfectly good parts are up for grabs, BTW.
 
Last edited:

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
OK, good news, bad news. The supposed-to-be grooved idler pulleys I ordered arrived, but were not grooved as the catalog photo indicated, but were the smooth idlers instead. I was trying for the pulley that is used on the tensioner. Now in doing forum searches is seems I am getting nowhere in finding this item. Can anyone here help me with part numbers/sources? How about used ones?
 

SHOZ123

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2000
Messages
12,152
Reaction score
673
Location
Illinois
I think the '99s had grooved pulleys. I may have some around. Most of them are smooth though.
 

rnddude

New Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
Ca.
My 97 has 3 smooth, rigid-mount idlers, and the smaller pulley on the tensioner is grooved, and that is the one I want to get two more of. The smooths work fine in the stock application because they contact the back (smooth) side of the belt, whereas the tensioner pulley (grooved) contacts the ribbed side of the belt. In my altered routing scheme described above, I want to replace the two upper smooth pulleys with two grooved pulleys, because the new routing has the belt ribs in contact with the two upper pulleys, and I would be much more comfortable with those being grooved than smooth, for tracking and belt life reasons. Once again, if anyone has 2 grooved pulleys from the tensioner available, I am very interested.
 

Phoenix

SHOHOLIC
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
3,767
Reaction score
1,646
Location
QC , Canada
I dont know if this is any help , but Ive done this on the V6 , eliminating mostly everything.

The bracket came off ebay , its for a SBC (small block chevy) of the old days.
I only had to modify it a bit. Using the alternator to bind it.

DSC01834.JPG
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,087
Messages
1,181,311
Members
16,153
Latest member
lapochkarr

Members online

Back
Top