cams and pins

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

chevy guy

New Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
wayne michigan
hey guys, use the pins, i have done a few of these at work, and the pins are better, i have not seen a cam set fail because of the gears, but we get people coming in and wanting it done, do you guys pull the motor when you do them, just wondering. randy,
 

Hochness

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
Welcome to the Forum first off.

You say you've done some pins on SHO's or Chevy's??

I've heard some concerns about either option (weld or pin). Anything that you do to these engines that's as intense and delicate as welding or pinning on the SHO will get people concerned or questioning.

What are your thoughts? Have you done welds or pins to the SHO engine before?


Sam
 

Hochness

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
Another thing....

When the weld is done I don't believe that the motor is pulled. Mainly the top of the engine is removed from what I can tell from pictures. I'm not the engine guru to talk to about this, the best person would be Kirk (SHODWN) he's the man with the most info and experience.

Just FYI, this is a heated dicussion on this Forum so be careful.

Everyone is entitled to his/her opinion though.
:)

Sam
 

SHODWN

Mother Threasa
Joined
Sep 22, 2001
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
487
Location
Spencer,Ma usa
Both are a good way to resolve the problem. But I dont think ANYONE (not directed at any one shop) has done the research to use the correct strength pins. The shaft and sprocket are 2 different RC hardnesses, if the pin is too soft its doing nothing, if its to hard it will oblong the shaft and fall out, causing MORE damage to the shaft/sprocket assmbly.

Nobody that is presently PINNING can tell me the Hardness of the pin that they are useing, So I feel because they dont speak up that they are unsure of it - And that scares me.

Pinning needs to be done outside the car, the cams must be removed which hide costs untill its time to reinstall. You need 3 different gaskets about 25.00 total, and you must pay your favorite mechanic about 30hrs in labor for the teardown and reassembly. Somewhere its stated that its 12 hrs to R and R the cams. That too is BS when FORD themselvs do not have a listing for it in the car. The do list a few things but that is after droping the entire Motor and tranny on the ground. Now this doesnt have to happen to send out your cams, but most shops after looking at the book will OPT to. It can be done in the car (I did a head swap in the car) but is was a royal pain.

So if you can loose the car for a MIN of a week for pinning and dont mine paying about 1000.00 give or take for labor + fluids and have the FORD timing tools specific for the V8SHO pinning is OK. But you still have a car with XXXXX miles on it and no tuneup.

Sam, thanks for the good words but FPS has seen about 75 cars to my mealisy 40 cars. So I would say they are the leaders by far. They created the procedure that several shops follow, some just do more than weld the cams. Id say that Im number 2 (no cracks!!!) but with 27 scheduled and the Tulsa trip see me in another month :)

Like I said either way is ok for now, nothing is really tested for normal everyday use and longetivity, The present tests that are being used to determin the length of time the cams will operate are BOGUS. running a tottal of 4 cams for these tests are not proof - if they ever happened. We only have one persons word to go on, and if they are true Ford will never let the results out of thier hands.

They way I look at is this way:
(again this is not to **** pinning, or directed at anyone person,place or thing)

Pinning will get you (cant find the real numbers) so going from what I remember)
4 Million miles, at 500 for pinning and a Minimum of 1000 in labor if you cant do it yourself, also a Min of a week down time and 25 or so in gaskets plus your favorite oil.

Welding goes 1.3 million miles, for a cost of about 500.00 in and out in most cases same day and its over. Some do more than just weld the cams so expect a little more for some expected maintience items. (same items should be done either way)

So most bang for the buck (which matters to all of us) is welding, and welding by a properly certified welder, and good equiptment. You dont want the same setting used that was just used to hang a muffler. Because of voltage variations and temp variations a test peice should be on hand for every single job before its started to test on. Also for 1.3 million miles which no one here will ever surpass you will need 13 transmissions. To get to the 4 million mark you will need 400 transmissions. :)

SPEND YOUR MONEY WISELY!

AND (dam Im long winded tonight) if that dont get my point across, here is some more data for people thinking of getting your cams welded or pinned, this is unbiased data no me telling you whats better and not the Pinners telling you whats better but actual data.

Copied from a post from Doug Lee (thanks Doug!!)
"Not that anyone really cares, but here's my two cents... I have put this situation into some finite element software. For those who don't know what finite element analysis (FEA) is, it's a means to analyze where stress concentrations are. This is denoted by color changing areas on the graphical output. A red area means high stress concentrations are at that point, and failure is definitely within the realm of possibility. Although both means of fixing the gear to the shaft are viable, I see two things in the graphs. With the pin option, a high stress concentration area occurs right where the hole would be drilled. Stress risers occur when there are holes in material, and thus the explanation of the red areas. Looking at the welded output, no stress risers occur here. This is because no metal has been removed, and thus why the red area is not shown anymore. The heat affected zone (HAZ) will occur near the weld, and actually hot work the metal. Thinking logically about these two options... pinning removes metal, whereas welding adds metal. I believe the welded option, when done properly, is the best way to fix this problem. My opinion is backed up by the FEA analysis. You make the decision."
 

stephen newberg

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2001
Messages
3,370
Reaction score
398
Location
Ladysmith, BC, Canada
The above from Kirk is a duplicate post since he posted the same message in another thread dealing with the same topic. In the interests of fairness, this thread will stay open, but could posters please keep it to a calm discussion? Thanks ahead of time.

pax, smn
 

stephen newberg

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2001
Messages
3,370
Reaction score
398
Location
Ladysmith, BC, Canada
In fact, there were three of these on about the same topic ongoing. One was closed a couple of days ago, one was closed first thing this morning, and hopefully this one still remaining open will be able to continue to discuss the topic without getting into name calling, which was happening in the others.

As a recap, it appears that both welding and pinning will do the job. Pinning might last longer and is more expensive, but welding is still likely to last far longer than anyone is going to own the car, so most people will want to look at this very closely before going for the more expensive pinning operation.

And, to make things very clear, Kirk offers the welding system from his shop and Tom offers the pinning system from his, so both have reasons to support their views of what is best.

And to really try to be fair, there are 20,000 Gen III SHOs out there and less than 200 documented cases of cam sproket failure.

Personally, I think the design flaw is worth the insurance cost of getting a weld or pin job done, but I also think that we are way up the scare ladder at this point in time, and possibly without sufficient backing. From what others have said, the value of the car is being seriously depressed in the used market by the fear of a failure that thus far is know to effect less than 1% of the field. I wish Ford was stepping up to take care of us even at that low number, but I can understand why they might not.

And finally, in a new thread on this topic it has been suggested that each provider of a service for cam repair make a presentation that does not try to cut down the other. The other moderator of this forum has agreed to this, and I do also, so I am going to lock this one also so we can try to get this all in one place without a lot of flaming.


pax, smn

<small>[ January 28, 2003, 07:28 PM: Message edited by: stephen newberg ]</small>
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,077
Messages
1,181,195
Members
16,141
Latest member
grapnelg

Members online

Back
Top