92 MTX SHO - Mustang Dyno (Now with Video)

[1995SHO9]

Wasn't one blown engine enough for you?

Yes sir.

 

[38SHO]

how the F I miss this thread.... car sounds good sam

dissapointing numbers to me... it is a 3.0 tho

try some other dynos and maybe you'll have something better... or just try a 3.2 with that topend package

 

[Sho Amo]

i need cams

 

[AREA 91]

Sweet HP man. TQ seems low though? A guy on here just dyno'd 203FT pounds with a mtx swap..

http://www.shoforum.com/showthread.php?t=95301

That's not a fair comparison, John.
These are 2 different dyno's.
One engine has cams, the other does not.

 

[SHOspazz92]

That's not a fair comparison, John.
These are 2 different dyno's.
One engine has cams, the other does not.

Either way, My TQ numbers were low. Between the MAF that was in the car and the fact that the Dyno had not been ran or calibrated in 4 months may have had somthing to do with it. Either way, I would not expect the car to put out more then 200 FWTQ, Altho it does run a **** of a lot better since putting the stock MAF back in.

-Sam

 

[SHO_DOODmorrris]

Looks slow... my lawnmower makes more tq then that.