92 MTX SHO - Mustang Dyno (Now with Video)

[SHOspazz92]

219 FWHP.

177 FWTQ.

http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q29/kellen17/?action=view&current=MOV02357.flv

All this on a Mustang Dyno.

3.0L engine with fresh rod and main bearings (July 2008)
TwEECer RT
SHONut +20 cams
SHO Shop BBB
PNP Intake Manifold.
75mm Pro-M MAF
3.2 injectors
3.2 oil pump
custom 2-1/2" stainless exhaust system
Magnaflow stainless resonator
Magnaflow stainless muffler
Accel plug wires
Swain Tech coated exhaust manifolds
FPS stainless catless Y-pipe
Walboro 155 LPH pump.
Deleted A/C System.


My First two numbers were in the 190/160 Range as they were having trouble calibrating there dyno for my car - The car had to be Dynoed with the Dyno in AWD mode (So my SHO appeared to be AWD at times ) and a few other things were kind of screwy with the Dyno, But eventually they were able to get those numbers. Unfortunently, Because it was a Dyno Day they had another car on the Dyno before I finished parking, So when I went back in to get my sheet they already had myself stuff out of there system. I'll get the car on another Dyno again soon to get some solid numbers.

Video's to come soon.

-Sam

 

[BlackonBlack89]

cool to see u took into to the dyno. I wonder wat they had trouble with? Weird they had trouble with my car too. The first TQ was only 152

Go to the real dyno..............1/4 dyno ::frantic:


Edit* wasn't this car dyno'd before. It was at 260(chp) something IIRC.

 

[1995SHO9]

Sweet HP man. TQ seems low though? A guy on here just dyno'd 203FT pounds with a mtx swap..

http://www.shoforum.com/showthread.php?t=95301

 

[SHOspazz92]

Sweet HP man. TQ seems low though? A guy on here just dyno'd 203FT pounds with a mtx swap..

http://www.shoforum.com/showthread.php?t=95301

Mustang Dyno's Typically show numbers that are 11-14% Less then a Dyno Jet, It highly depends on the Dyno however.

-Sam

 

[1995SHO9]

Ah, then when I dyno my car, I have to do it at a dyno jet.......

 

[Shoaz]

Mustang Dyno's Typically show numbers that are 11-14% Less then a Dyno Jet, It highly depends on the Dyno however.

-Sam

The 203 ft-lbs was on a Mustang dyno. Stock 3.2.

 

[SHOspazz92]

The 203 ft-lbs was on a Mustang dyno. Stock 3.2.

Interesting.

Regardless, I still need to visit a different Dyno. These guy's while very nice seemed kind of confused on how to run their own dyno.

-Sam

 

[Brett]

OMG great numbers at what RPM does the vtac kick in 9.5k?

the 200 torque number was from a 3.2. Also mustang dyno vs. dynojet (im guessing) EDIT: looks like i was beat to it.


Boo for selling the zex kit... Just throwing that out there. :sun:



Great numbers sam, Interested to see what kind of numbers it'll make on a dynojet.

I dunno how i'd feel about someone who has so much trouble setting up their own dyno, or the numbers that came from it.

NEW EDIT: you start playing with the tweecer yet sam?

 

[Jonny Cash]

Id try a different dyno for sure.

 

[SHOspazz92]

OMG great numbers at what RPM does the vtac kick in 9.5k?

the 200 torque number was from a 3.2. Also mustang dyno vs. dynojet (im guessing) EDIT: looks like i was beat to it.


Boo for selling the zex kit... Just throwing that out there. :sun:



Great numbers sam, Interested to see what kind of numbers it'll make on a dynojet.

NEW EDIT: you start playing with the tweecer yet sam?

No, I'm having trouble getting Calcon to work. Caledit reads the Tweecer but for whatever reason I can't get Calcon to, I'm looking in to it.

-Sam

 

[AutoSHO]

Sam, try payloading the tweecer to datalog.

And, it is highly dyno-calibration dependant with a Mustang. My 92 made 204hp/208tq on a mustang dyno (stock 3.0)... 194/188 on a Dynojet.

Might as well go find a dynojet, they're more likely to spit out generic, repeatable, somewhat-roundabout-maybe accurate numbers.

 

[1995SHO9]

No, I'm having trouble getting Calcon to work. Caledit reads the Tweecer but for whatever reason I can't get Calcon to, I'm looking in to it.

-Sam

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it...

Anyways, I had a hard time with running it on window's vista, which op system do you have?

 

[SHOspazz92]

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it...

Anyways, I had a hard time with running it on window's vista, which op system do you have?

XP.


-Sam

 

[1995SHO9]

Hmm, I'm not sure, but I know under the help section, it will tell you how to make it work with various op systems.

~Johnathon~

 

[NCTaurusSHO]

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it..



The tweecer not working for you? Thats the ONLY way to tune nothing else!

 

[Brett]

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it..



The tweecer not working for you? Thats the ONLY way to tune nothing else!

:snap:

 

[AutoSHO]

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it...

If you take the time to learn how to use the tweecer, it works better than any other solution out there that keeps the stock computer.

Of course the Apexi is easier, it's made so that all the Honda/Acura owners out there can use it.

 

[K-Dawg]

These guy's while very nice seemed kind of confused on how to run their own dyno.

-Sam

That seems to be the trend with dyno operators.

 

[Toolman]

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it...

Wasn't one blown engine enough for you?

Back on topic, go to different dyno Sam. Dynojets are way more consistent from what I have seen. My car has seen 4 different dyno, maybe 6-7 different times, and the numbers were always very consistent. I think from one dyno to another here in Tulsa (with different days, different operators), the numbers were within 0.5%

 

[yamahaSHO]

219 FWHP.

177 FWTQ.

http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q29/kellen17/?action=view&current=MOV02357.flv

All this on a Mustang Dyno.

3.0L engine with fresh rod and main bearings (July 2008)
TwEECer RT
SHONut +20 cams
SHO Shop BBB
PNP Intake Manifold.
75mm Pro-M MAF
3.2 injectors
3.2 oil pump
custom 2-1/2" stainless exhaust system
Magnaflow stainless resonator
Magnaflow stainless muffler
Accel plug wires
Swain Tech coated exhaust manifolds
FPS stainless catless Y-pipe
Walboro 155 LPH pump.
Deleted A/C System.


My First two numbers were in the 190/160 Range as they were having trouble calibrating there dyno for my car - The car had to be Dynoed with the Dyno in AWD mode (So my SHO appeared to be AWD at times ) and a few other things were kind of screwy with the Dyno, But eventually they were able to get those numbers. Unfortunently, Because it was a Dyno Day they had another car on the Dyno before I finished parking, So when I went back in to get my sheet they already had myself stuff out of there system. I'll get the car on another Dyno again soon to get some solid numbers.

Video's to come soon.

-Sam

Those are pretty similar to my old numbers on a DynoJet. I'm not sure how your tune is, but we woke my car up after tuning (wasn't tuned on the dyno). Keep up the good work FOKKER! You can always find my number in the global if you're needing some tuning help.

TWEECER SUCKS TO TUNE WITH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Apexi was so much easier, I wish I would have stuck with it...

Anyways, I had a hard time with running it on window's vista, which op system do you have?

It's actually quite easy... Having a clear understanding of how an engine works, what causes x in an engine and how the computer is doing things makes this st00pid simple.

As for as your OS... I don't think it was every really meant to be on Vista. I keep XP on my laptops just for this.

If you take the time to learn how to use the tweecer, it works better than any other solution out there that keeps the stock computer.

Of course the Apexi is easier, it's made so that all the Honda/Acura owners out there can use it.

You mean it's gotta be on a level for the masses of teenagers out there with their mad-tite Honda's :snap:?

Wasn't one blown engine enough for you?

:hdance:

Back on topic, go to different dyno Sam. Dynojets are way more consistent from what I have seen. My car has seen 4 different dyno, maybe 6-7 different times, and the numbers were always very consistent. I think from one dyno to another here in Tulsa (with different days, different operators), the numbers were within 0.5%

I have only ever used a DynoJet because of this.