That's some very interesting work. I love the radiused entries from the plenum to the runners.
The head work is very extensive. I would imagine that all the work to enlarge the communication area between the primary and secondary ports will negate much of the purpose of the long (small diameter) primary runners. On the other hand, the larger secondary runner looks like it has a much better distribution to both intake valves.
I would love to know more about this work. Who is doing it?
I am
What I was going for with the head work is the capability to first enlarge the communication area, and second move the communication point around. Where the intake manifold mates to the head could be the "New" communication point. We can do even better than that and move the point as high as possible into the intake manifold. This could set the stage for a ultra short secondary runner, only 3" to the intake plenum without horns, and 6" with horns. Not only that but we can closely almost match the lenght of the secondary port and primary ports. With a Ultra high communication point and the secondary horns installed the runners are almost equal length and each runner being served from a oppsite plenum. This could be wonderfull for the +40 cams. Low reversion, large mass flow to the head.
The point is....
I can play with the ports in many ways, create different shapes.
P.S. The red and silver intake, the owner has reported a .3 secs better in the quarter mile
15.8 first week, and 15.5 second week with intake installed, ATX
Last edited: