remote mount turbo

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

zerg1024

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
217
Reaction score
1
Location
NJ
ok so i will be buying a remote mount turbo kit for my sho and i talked to vernon at sts turbo and he said i should go with the stage 3 universal kit along with a 60-1 turbo. i was wondering what does the pcv check valve do?>
 

Mrpeepers

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
30
Reaction score
7
Location
WI
The check valve is likely used to keep the PCV valve from seeing any boost(often start to leak) and keep any boost from making its way into the crank case. It will either replace the OEM PCV valve entirely or be put inline with it on the intake manifold side. I'm not sure exactly how they'll have it but this is the common set up for turbo cars.
 
Last edited:

shobote

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
207
Location
Naperville, IL
I am also interested; Just wondering what price Vernon quoted you for the STS package ? It seems it does not require an intercooler due to the inherant cooling of the intake via the piping under the chassis ? IIRC Somebody on the forum has a remote setup and it seems to work very well.
 

40BelowSummer

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
1,819
Reaction score
54
Location
Puerto Rico
I am also interested; Just wondering what price Vernon quoted you for the STS package ? It seems it does not require an intercooler due to the inherant cooling of the intake via the piping under the chassis ? IIRC Somebody on the forum has a remote setup and it seems to work very well.
Search for 'remote turbo' and you should find several of Scott's (Username=strings____) threads. And its true, the stretch of piping under the chassis will cool the intake charge much more than a traditional mount with no intercooler, lessening the need of an intercooler.

I have plans of doing this, but I'm going for the more cost-effective route of piecing together my own "kit".
 

somedude_001

SHO Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2004
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
317
Location
Western NY
I am also interested; Just wondering what price Vernon quoted you for the STS package ? It seems it does not require an intercooler due to the inherant cooling of the intake via the piping under the chassis ? IIRC Somebody on the forum has a remote setup and it seems to work very well.[

it worked well untill he was running too much boost and his intake temps were oo high and he killed his engine.

don't get greedy with boost.

said user has since switched to a conventional mount turbo.

edit: you will not need the PCV check valve. You do however need to vent both to the atmosphere
 
Last edited:

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
I have as remote of a turbo as you should ever bother with

Troof.jpg !

in all seriousness, just put the turbo RIGHT behind the engine, even if you have to notch the floorboard and make a new piece of sheetmetal to weld in
 
Last edited:

zerg1024

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
217
Reaction score
1
Location
NJ
yes i was about to say our cars really dont have a pcv valve
 

HotRodKid

mmmmm ... turbo
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
642
Location
Western NY
they still have a breather that hooks to the throttle body. the reasin theres no Valve is because they work via intentionaly circulating air thru the crank case

the valve cover line is the in, the out connects to the manifold, behind the throttle body, so it always sees vacuum

a PCV system just allows PRESSURE to vent from the crankcase,

so you still need a check valve, or to plug the TB port and just dump the hoses into a breather, into the exhaust, or just plain overboard

warning: dumping the fumes overboard may result in fireballs and engine fires, especialy after you crack some ring lands by running to much boost .... paging Somedude, lol
 

Mrpeepers

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
30
Reaction score
7
Location
WI
The correct way would be to hook up the check valve from the crankcase to any area behind the throttle plate, and another breather line going from the crankcase to any area in front of the turbo inlet. The check valve would of course be oriented so no boost would enter the crankcase. Put a catch can in the breather going to the turbo inlet side if you are worried about oil build up, and even one on the check valve side.
 

strings1732

RMTE-TRBO-SHO
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
743
Reaction score
16
Location
colorado
just to correct some things here, my car is still remote turbo'd and runs very well at 17-18 psi. it has a new clutch and runs great, even pulled a new best time at the drag strip... And won first place for the evening! consistency, good launches and a new best time all in one night... God I love this car!

Also, my pcv system(valve cover and the one that hooks to the bottom of the TB) are both vented into a catchcan of sorts. it works well for my setup.
 
Last edited:

AREA 91

PA SHO SHOP
Joined
Jul 17, 2002
Messages
5,349
Reaction score
1,003
Location
Area 91
just to correct some things here, my car is still remote turbo'd and runs very well at 17-18 psi. it has a new clutch and runs great, even pulled a new best time at the drag strip... And won first place for the evening! consistency, good launches and a new best time all in one night... God I love this car!

Also, my pcv system(valve cover and the one that hooks to the bottom of the TB) are both vented into a catchcan of sorts. it works well for my setup.

What did you run at the drags???
 

strings1732

RMTE-TRBO-SHO
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
743
Reaction score
16
Location
colorado
hey there is nothing wrong wih my "catchcan" LOL! remember, when DR. Pepper sees it, they might give me a free drink for product placement! Or sue me... lmao!
 

SHOguy 92

New Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
3,356
Reaction score
9
Location
Duluth, MN
13.749 @ 106.24 It's in the top ten quickest post too

At sea level wouldn't that put you as the quickest in the 1/4? :evilgrin:I don't really know how to calc it (and am too lazy too look into it), but I know it has to be close and I gotta stir this stick since 1st place had asked what altitude.
 

somedude_001

SHO Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2004
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
317
Location
Western NY
At sea level wouldn't that put you as the quickest in the 1/4? :evilgrin:I don't really know how to calc it (and am too lazy too look into it), but I know it has to be close and I gotta stir this stick since 1st place had asked what altitude.

I think the question is if he was at sea level would the car hold togeather from the added power? If so I will have to get back to work on my car.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
107,085
Messages
1,181,298
Members
16,152
Latest member
lapochkarr

Members online

Back
Top