High on Ethanol
Just Ain't Care
I bolded your statement. This is why you have seen a major drop off in my attendance lately.
So you are a doge coin millionaire or you lost everything lol
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I bolded your statement. This is why you have seen a major drop off in my attendance lately.
Let's not clutter Mike's thread anymore.So you are a doge coin millionaire or you lost everything lol
Actually, it's going to be an Olson Race edition 1 of 1 and painted blueIt’s painted black...
Guys....chill the f**k out.
My logical conclusion........
If I was a vendor/trans builder and I partnered with a high horsepower build on a questionable trans I would ask for secrecy as well. We all know the 6f55 is hit and miss. Mike's stock one lived, mine didn't. Hit and miss.
As the builder I would like to know that my product would be able to produce in a real world application. Once I felt that was criteria was met, then I would go public. I wouldn't want to go public before, then have Mike's new motor completely grenade my product. It protects me and Mike. However, if it holds up and preforms then I have that ace in my pocket tried and true.
Kinda my thought here honestly. It's a leap of faith, and the builder may not want the build sheet out there for a ton of people to copy if it ends up not working and he gets blamed for a bunch of failures, it could be bad for his business.
I'm more eager to see how this goes, and hopefully once it's back together and successful it'll be the Level 11 transmission we've all been waiting for, then mixed with the PTU and RDU upgrades we're looking at producing we can start targeting that 1000hp SHO that Jack Lane has been touting for the past decade...
@ Ecoboost_xsport .....
No need to get annoyed. I was asked not to disclose. I'm honoring that request. Simple as that.
And as far as you (& any others) sharing things.... my reputation in this platform, as well as sharing of info, write ups, etc. long precedes you and most other newer owners.
So don't feel obliged to elevate yourself upon a pedestal there my friend.
Finally, there are a multitude of influencing factors that have kept the platform from advancing. Most of which have absolutely nothing to do with individual owners.
That's been prevalent since the 1st GEN SHO's have rolled out. Ask any of those (term used loosely) "older" GEN owners.
Stay safe and keep having fun motoring along. I follow you and others likewise.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
You are good man Charlie Brown. Keep your word and your honor, and flick off those that are jealous. You already help and share enough for others to be grateful for your input.
My latest update. - I keep losing time in my 2-3 gear shift, since the adding the GH intercooler, and still not back to full capacity with the tuning with the intercooler addition. But now I am still running in the 1.85 for my 60ft even with the tire pressure recommendations of 28 psi in the front and 40 in rear, but still not to the full tune yet either.
You are good man Charlie Brown. Keep your word and your honor, and flick off those that are jealous. You already help and share enough for others to be grateful for your input.
My latest update. - I keep losing time in my 2-3 gear shift, since the adding the GH intercooler, and still not back to full capacity with the tuning with the intercooler addition. But now I am still running in the 1.85 for my 60ft even with the tire pressure recommendations of 28 psi in the front and 40 in rear, but still not to the full tune yet either.
You are good man Charlie Brown. Keep your word and your honor, and flick off those that are jealous. You already help and share enough for others to be grateful for your input.
My latest update. - I keep losing time in my 2-3 gear shift, since the adding the GH intercooler, and still not back to full capacity with the tuning with the intercooler addition. But now I am still running in the 1.85 for my 60ft even with the tire pressure recommendations of 28 psi in the front and 40 in rear, but still not to the full tune yet either.
Rehash the drama and post an irrelevant update to your car in someone’s build thread, nice! It’s kinda hard to help without any previous context. Your 60’ times aren’t terrible. Draggy is not accurate at all if that’s what your using to measure 60’ times.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Dragy is extremely accurate, the road and prep is not realistic for track expectations though. I think that's what you were trying to say![]()
Idk I'd say it's extremely accurate within a tenth, but in every aspect like sixty foot is "within a tenth" as well as quarter mile is "within a tenth" which I guess means sixty foot is less accurate then the quarter mile then? LOL.. I think I've gotten a 1.6-1.7 sixty foot on dragy maybe twice compared to what I get on the slip, but you don't get the shallow stage benefit on dragy like you would in real life.I dunno, when running draggy at the track both the ET and 60’ times are both noticeably slower than the the time slips.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Is there a beer you shouldn't try?Hi Mike, how ya been? Any new beers I should try?
Rehash the drama and post an irrelevant update to your car in someone’s build thread, nice! It’s kinda hard to help without any previous context. Your 60’ times aren’t terrible. Draggy is not accurate at all if that’s what your using to measure 60’ times.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro