LMS vs Gearhead "Canned Tunes" Comparison

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

76FoMoCo

SHO Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
1,940
Location
Nampa, ID
then going to put it up against a AJP tune and then will put up the same with meth.
dam going to need a punch card and the dyno shop....
 

sanman

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
103
Reaction score
54
the new tune is label 93V11 but is NOT the same as the early V11 the shift points are not the same and the power is a noticeable less. going to put it on the dyno in the next few weeks.
Thanks would love to see the Dyno
 

SM105K

Streetlight Grand Prix Champ/ IG @fafomotorsports
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
7,406
Reaction score
9,703
Location
Arizona
Interesting... agreed. Better tires would get me there for sure.... add downpipes and both tunes are in the 11’’s

Curious though.... yours had more torque, but what does the torque curve look like? I’m at 400+ torque almost instantly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get 400+ at 2700-2800 ish rpm. SHO Dyno Fall 2018
 

OmaHahn

SHO Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
829
Location
Omaha
To answer your questions directly about the V11 issue and tuners "tuning around the problem".. the answer is that the V11 tune is a summer oriented tune. LMS is just running too rich at the load they are running for the stock HPFP. Colder air compounds the problem since their tune doesn't adapt for it. Gearhead's tune will pull back the boost when the air is colder cause you are already hitting desired load. LMS will start to close the throttle. Different approaches but one works better than the other as preventing low fuel pressure issues.. aka stuttering/hesitation.

But from LMS standpoint.. if they roll back to another tune with less power then people get pissy about it and complain. The tune will run fine in the warmer months no doubt... might be worth loading the 91 octane V11 tune when its colder out.

Mine did it all year here in the Midwest, cold, warm, hot....
 

OmaHahn

SHO Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
829
Location
Omaha
I'm talking to Anthony now about the V11 tune i'm having major issue with hesitation on WOT. Anthony's answer was "This is caused by the high pressure fuel pump pressure dropping because these cars are physically making so much power that they need more fuel system." LMS gave me a winter tune has anybody tried the new tune i did not installed yet= looking for some feedback please, i read the new tune is safer but not as much power?.....I've also read GH has fixed the shifting and hesitation problem with there tune if so please let me know..... Thanks

"....these cars are physically making so much power...." (they need a HPFP). This still doesn't make sense. My Gearhead tune made even more power than my LMS 93 V11 and no missed shifts and no WOT hesitation. Anthony/LMS still hasn't answered me on this.
 

mattr66

SHO Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
320
Reaction score
694
The fuel pressure problem is running them too rich and puting extra demand on the fuel system. The argument is durability at wot from running leaner. From my experience, too rich and not enough timing will cook the catalytic converters much faster than leaning it out a bit because the rich mixture is causing an exothermic event in the cat itself (burning fuel in the cat). This is what happens at startup when raw fuel and negative timing is used to "light off" the cat. You DO NOT want this at wot..... On the cold weather issue, it is very easy to set a load (VE) limit that cannot be exceeded under any condition....

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
The fuel pressure problem is running them too rich and puting extra demand on the fuel system. The argument is durability at wot from running leaner. From my experience, too rich and not enough timing will cook the catalytic converters much faster than leaning it out a bit because the rich mixture is causing an exothermic event in the cat itself (burning fuel in the cat). This is what happens at startup when raw fuel and negative timing is used to "light off" the cat. You DO NOT want this at wot..... On the cold weather issue, it is very easy to set a load (VE) limit that cannot be exceeded under any condition....

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk

But with the engine itself, is leaning it out a bit impacting longevity in a negative way vs a bit rich?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mattr66

SHO Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
320
Reaction score
694
As long as you aren't detonating and cylinder temps are under control (these engines also have piston-cooling oil jets) you are fine. Running leaner also reduces carbon buildup in the cylinder and between the rings that eventually leads to ring gap closure and breaking the tops of the pistons off on high-mileage engines.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
As long as you aren't detonating and cylinder temps are under control (these engines also have piston-cooling oil jets) you are fine. Running leaner also reduces carbon buildup in the cylinder and between the rings that eventually leads to ring gap closure and breaking the tops of the pistons off on high-mileage engines.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk

How are we monitoring cylinder temps and do we know the thresholds?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mattr66

SHO Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
320
Reaction score
694
How are we monitoring cylinder temps and do we know the thresholds?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No way to actively monitor unless you add a probe. EGTs are a good indicator though and I've monitored on various projects and generally know where they should be.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 

mattr66

SHO Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
320
Reaction score
694
Let's remember this is a modern, direct injection engine with turbo'ed operating conditions in the design since day one.... This isn't adding boost to your NA small block Chevy where you have to run them overly rich to keep them together...

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 

ridered74

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,105
Reaction score
1,491
I finally caved to all the rave reviews I've been seeing Gearhead get the last year and half or so. Installed my gearhead tune this afternoon, didn't really have a chance to drive it much until a little bit ago.

Everyone talks about how smooth the shifts are. I always thought, oh they are just feeling the same way my transmission shifts, because mine never seemed clunky or overly forceful. There was probably something wrong with their other tunes, mine is fine.

Well I stand corrected. Compared to the Gearhead tune, every other tune I have used (unleashed, LMS and AJP) is extremely clunky and not smooth at all. I was absolutely amazed by it. It just always feels like you are in the right gear.

If you haven't tried it, I very highly recommend it. I would almost bet my own money that once you try it you will not bother ever switching back to your previous tunes. It's only a hundred bucks.....Matt you need to up your price, because a hundred bucks is not doing your work justice.
 

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
I finally caved to all the rave reviews I've been seeing Gearhead get the last year and half or so. Installed my gearhead tune this afternoon, didn't really have a chance to drive it much until a little bit ago.

Everyone talks about how smooth the shifts are. I always thought, oh they are just feeling the same way my transmission shifts, because mine never seemed clunky or overly forceful. There was probably something wrong with their other tunes, mine is fine.

Well I stand corrected. Compared to the Gearhead tune, every other tune I have used (unleashed, LMS and AJP) is extremely clunky and not smooth at all. I was absolutely amazed by it. It just always feels like you are in the right gear.

If you haven't tried it, I very highly recommend it. I would almost bet my own money that once you try it you will not bother ever switching back to your previous tunes. It's only a hundred bucks.....Matt you need to up your price, because a hundred bucks is not doing your work justice.


Glad it’s working out! How’s the new HPFP running?!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

OmaHahn

SHO Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
829
Location
Omaha
I finally caved to all the rave reviews I've been seeing Gearhead get the last year and half or so. Installed my gearhead tune this afternoon, didn't really have a chance to drive it much until a little bit ago.

Everyone talks about how smooth the shifts are. I always thought, oh they are just feeling the same way my transmission shifts, because mine never seemed clunky or overly forceful. There was probably something wrong with their other tunes, mine is fine.

Well I stand corrected. Compared to the Gearhead tune, every other tune I have used (unleashed, LMS and AJP) is extremely clunky and not smooth at all. I was absolutely amazed by it. It just always feels like you are in the right gear.

If you haven't tried it, I very highly recommend it. I would almost bet my own money that once you try it you will not bother ever switching back to your previous tunes. It's only a hundred bucks.....Matt you need to up your price, because a hundred bucks is not doing your work justice.

Hope this thread helped you and glad you love it! I couldn't agree more - I had a hard time finding the correct words to use explaining the shifting!! I still don't get it - how can the shifts be instant, lightning-fast, but not harsh at all?! It's like when watching YouTube videos of an Audi R8 shifting for example! Matt is the man!
 

SHOdded

SHO Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
9,045
Reaction score
4,390
Location
Maryland
Speaking of longevity and oil, running full synthetic SN+ compliant products will aid that effort in the long run. Most major brands are now up-to-date, and boutique oils like Royal Purple and Amsoil as well. Redline's Pro series is what you'd want to run.
 

OmaHahn

SHO Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
829
Location
Omaha
Speaking of longevity and oil, running full synthetic SN+ compliant products will aid that effort in the long run. Most major brands are now up-to-date, and boutique oils like Royal Purple and Amsoil as well. Redline's Pro series is what you'd want to run.

I always take my car to the Ford dealer since they gave me 3 years of free oil changes and they do all the maintenance, etc. Wonder if they'd let me bring in my own oil to use? What's you top pick, Redline?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,098
Messages
1,181,372
Members
16,160
Latest member
tinkerkathleen

Members online

Back
Top