Blue turd at the strip

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

zach44102

BIG TURBO
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,651
Location
Georgia
My best 60' time was a 2.229, But my clutch started slipping on my 2 to 3 shift because it was my 5th pass with out letting the car cool. My fastest time was.

R/T ... .002
60' .. 2.476
330 ... 6.498
1/8 ... 9.742
MPH ... 75.77
1000 ... 12.536

1/4 ... 14.859

MPH ... 96.69
 

SHOCH

Tommy Boy
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
1,965
Location
near SHOcago
Because facepalm.
Put all the stuff back in, then you have an excuse.
nice .002 though.
 

zach44102

BIG TURBO
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,651
Location
Georgia
Because facepalm.
Put all the stuff back in, then you have an excuse.
nice .002 though.

I really dont understand why your going to try to give me shit over those numbers. I like my car gutted, it makes a **** of a difference. Get the **** over it.
 

yamahaSHO

E85 whore
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
10,646
Reaction score
2,516
Location
Arkansas
What was the DA for the day? It is a decent time with a very nice trap speed.
 

SHOspazz92

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
6,952
Reaction score
3,672
Location
Triad Area, North Carolina.
That's nearly a 97 MPH trap speed. IIRC, Zach said it was 90-95% humidity. FWIW, my 3.0 traps 101 MPH in 55-60* weather with a lot less humidity, and probably only 97-98 MPH in weather similar to when Zach ran. I would not be surprised if that car goes 99 or close to 100 when it cools off.

Also, that 2.4 60' blows donkey dick and he still ran a 14.8, With a 2.1-2.2 60', that car would have gone 14.2-14.4 no problem that night.

-Sam
 

zach44102

BIG TURBO
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,651
Location
Georgia
Yes it was 90% humidity and 85 degrees at the coolest part of the day. Ill be going back out here in a couple weeks with new parts installed with cooler temps. I was very disappointed though afterwards cause i wanted to make the top 10 fastest N/a MTX. Next time I go out ill have BBB, PnP runners installed, Ill also have koni's and intrax installed as well. If I go out there again and run a 14.2-14.4 Ill be stoked. I really do think the car has more in it though and very well capable of it. It starts running out of breath around 6600 rpm, but It really put you back in the seat at 5500 rpm. Im hoping with all the time i have spent on the intake that it will help it breath up top. I also think that having no hood was messing with my trap speeds. I think it made more harm than good. Less weight over the front wheels, and poor aerodynamics at high speed
 
Last edited:

jayro

SHO Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
1,918
Reaction score
349
Location
Auburn, In
Looks like the car is running pretty strong. If you cut the 60' down to the 2.2 range (too bad your clutch started slipping on the good one) you should be able to get low 14's. I remember reading that every tenth off your 60' is equal to 2 tenths on your et. Weight reduction it nice.....its amazing how different it makes the car feel.
 

SHOCH

Tommy Boy
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
1,965
Location
near SHOcago
I really dont understand why your going to try to give me shit over those numbers. I like my car gutted, it makes a **** of a difference. Get the **** over it.

So we're clear here I never gave you shit over unloading your car, I couldn't care less. really, I enjoyed that thread and don't care what you do to your car. It was a joke, get over it.
fwiw 14.806 stock + my 250 lb ass, and Ryan Pasch 14.5 stock = not impressed.
what tires?
which way was the wind blowing?
did you ice the intake betwen runs? why not?
listen, lighten up, YOU called it a turd in the title.
 

zach44102

BIG TURBO
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,651
Location
Georgia
So we're clear here I never gave you shit over unloading your car, I couldn't care less. really, I enjoyed that thread and don't care what you do to your car. It was a joke, get over it.
fwiw 14.806 stock + my 250 lb ass, and Ryan Pasch 14.5 stock = not impressed.
what tires?
which way was the wind blowing?
did you ice the intake betwen runs? why not?
listen, lighten up, YOU called it a turd in the title.

Bridgestone potenza re760's. brand new.
No ice, no wind, And for those who know me my cars actual name is the blue turd. But i bet your stock 14.8 was not trapping 97 mph. :)
 

steve142857

11's in '12 ; )
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
660
Reaction score
164
Location
Quebec
My best 60' time was a 2.229, But my clutch started slipping on my 2 to 3 shift because it was my 5th pass with out letting the car cool. My fastest time was.

R/T ... .002
60' .. 2.476
330 ... 6.498
1/8 ... 9.742
MPH ... 75.77
1000 ... 12.536

1/4 ... 14.859

MPH ... 96.69
I find it pretty quick and I 'm sure it is fun to drive... I never been in a older Taurus but would love to ride one these days, especially the MTX... You just need to work on that 60 ft and you could easily get under mid 14's. Before my actual SHO, I had a Fusion V6 FWD (SCT tune and Steeda CAI )... I was having around 2.30-2.35 60 ft., but my best was 14.98 at 93mph (on youtube if you want to see steve142857). So, I'm sure your car should be able to beat that easily with better launch. G/L and keep us posted!
Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2002
Messages
2,516
Reaction score
2,351
Location
Westerly, RI
Im not really sure what the question is, it was my first time at a drag strip. I staged just like everybody els.

There's the terms "deep staging" and "shallow staging". If this was your first time drag racing, you don't need to worry about that just yet. Deep staging refers to rolling a little further after the staging light comes on, to help reduce RTs and ETs. The further in you stage, the lower your RT and ET will be. However, when doing this, you also need to change your launch so that you don't red light.

Cutting a perfect light would be an RT of .500 with a normal tree (which is what most tracks run on test n tune nights). The RT begins after the last yellow light goes out, so by simple nature of the beast, the deeper you're staged, the less distance you have to cover to get a better 60', and also a better ET.


All of this stuff should come as you get more practice at the strip. It's nice to know this stuff, but you'll need to get your launch down, what your car likes, what you're comfortable with, etc.

As far as launch, there's all types of techniques that work for different cars, different drivers, etc. Some people prefer the 4k dump the clutch method, others are more graceful about it (especially if you have to drive the car home afterwards!).

I'd say for your first time out, you did very well! The trap speed is impressive, and I'd say the work you did to lighten it paid off well.

In comparison, I suck at drag racing, because I'm afraid to break my car. The best time I ran last year, in the cool dry weather of New Hampshire, was a 15.2. My car has a full interior and moonroof, nothing done to lighten it, a 3.2 mtx, and crappy all season tires. No LSD, no welded diff, so I'm particularly careful about launching.

Here's a good article about drag racing, and how to get all OCD about shit:

http://www.modernracer.com/tips/dragracingbasics.html
 

K-Dawg

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6,063
Reaction score
1,333
Location
Treasure Coast, FL
For a test n tune, you'll get a better ET by staging shallow because you get more of a running start. RT doesn't matter in test n tune. It doesn't affect ET either. When practicing my launch and shooting for the lowest ET, I've sat at the green tree for a couple seconds until I'm ready to go.
 

steve142857

11's in '12 ; )
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Messages
660
Reaction score
164
Location
Quebec
There's the terms "deep staging" and "shallow staging". If this was your first time drag racing, you don't need to worry about that just yet. Deep staging refers to rolling a little further after the staging light comes on, to help reduce RTs and ETs. The further in you stage, the lower your RT and ET will be. However, when doing this, you also need to change your launch so that you don't red light.

Cutting a perfect light would be an RT of .500 with a normal tree (which is what most tracks run on test n tune nights). The RT begins after the last yellow light goes out, so by simple nature of the beast, the deeper you're staged, the less distance you have to cover to get a better 60', and also a better ET.


All of this stuff should come as you get more practice at the strip. It's nice to know this stuff, but you'll need to get your launch down, what your car likes, what you're comfortable with, etc.

As far as launch, there's all types of techniques that work for different cars, different drivers, etc. Some people prefer the 4k dump the clutch method, others are more graceful about it (especially if you have to drive the car home afterwards!).

I'd say for your first time out, you did very well! The trap speed is impressive, and I'd say the work you did to lighten it paid off well.

In comparison, I suck at drag racing, because I'm afraid to break my car. The best time I ran last year, in the cool dry weather of New Hampshire, was a 15.2. My car has a full interior and moonroof, nothing done to lighten it, a 3.2 mtx, and crappy all season tires. No LSD, no welded diff, so I'm particularly careful about launching.

Here's a good article about drag racing, and how to get all OCD about shit:

http://www.modernracer.com/tips/dragracingbasics.html
Hi Bob,
I believe that you meant to say to deeper you stage, the better your reaction time will be, but usually your ET and trap speed won't be as fast as if you barely light the second light (shallow stage), where you get a bigger roll, therefore a better 60ft, ET and trap speed... Usually, it is true that one should shallow stage to get better results, but when bracket racing, you want to stage the deepest possible, so that you have less distance to cover to win the race... However, I prefer to shallow stage all the time and I just need to launch before, so that I start the 1/4 mile with a rolling advantage...
But, honestly, if a 1/4 mile is 1330 feet, I really don't think that we should make a big case for the first 1 foot... no? If someone does the 1/4 in 13.30 seconds, that is .01 second per foot... no big deal right?
Cheers !
 
Back
Top