Opinions on most ideal camber setup...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

rubydist

SHO Master
Staff member
Super Moderators
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
7,521
Reaction score
3,399
Location
Denver
A little more toe in also helps reduce excessive inside tire wear with more negative camber, so at -2 to -3 camber I would be running right at the limit of stock toe in spec.
 

Ecoboost_xsport

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
3,944
Location
Sacramento, CA
So you guys think I should actually be increasing my negative camber from what I currently show on that alignment sheet? Currently, front left is at -0.6, front right is at -1.4 and both rears are at -1.5

And when you mean close to the limit of stock toe, you refer to the max or min limit?
 

Ecoboost_xsport

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
3,944
Location
Sacramento, CA
Enough to over load the suspension at wot. Posible cure, stiffer rear suspension
Again, you, my friend, are in uncharted waters.
I am not thinking it's my suspension as I've got H&R sport springs, Bilstein B6s (step up from OEM B4s), pretty stiff Steeda sway bar and stronger toe links/trailing arms. It probably doesn't get much beefier or stiffer than this without becoming a harsh ride.
 

rubydist

SHO Master
Staff member
Super Moderators
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
7,521
Reaction score
3,399
Location
Denver
max toe in with that much negative camber is what I mean.
 

Ecoboost_xsport

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
3,944
Location
Sacramento, CA
So I'm gettin ready to take it in for another alignment. I think I'm going to go with a slightly more aggressive camber setup.

This is mostly for "spirited" street driving with the occasional stoplight "challenge".

Going to go with -2deg. I'm currently below the recommended settings at:

FL: -0.6deg
FR: -1.4deg
RL: -1.5deg
RR: -1.5deg

Question: front and rear identical or different setup for each?
 

Jordan_R

Stock Block Ready To Knock...er..Rock
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
1,775
Reaction score
4,455
Location
Missouri
So I've had plenty of time to think about this and what I went with was as close to zero camber in the front because personally I think that helps get a good contact patch for digz and being so heavily biased to the front. However rear I have -1.8 degrees of camber which I figured would decrease when I stripped the car. However you say your drive pretty spirited so I'm assuming twisties so -2 camber would do you well. That's basically euro specs in camber which they usually handle the twisties better. Just remember more camber means less contact patch on the ground when straight lining. Camber helps the tires grip when they have a load around a corner. All about finding a balance in that sense I guess.
 

rubydist

SHO Master
Staff member
Super Moderators
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
7,521
Reaction score
3,399
Location
Denver
How much does the front of the car come up when you mash on the gas? and what does that do to the camber?
 

Jordan_R

Stock Block Ready To Knock...er..Rock
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
1,775
Reaction score
4,455
Location
Missouri
How much does the front of the car come up when you mash on the gas? and what does that do to the camber?
That's something that is getting addressed with my race team buddy once the car is back together! Gonna do the whole slow mo analysis
 

SM105K

Streetlight Grand Prix Champ/ IG @fafomotorsports
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
7,405
Reaction score
9,701
Location
Arizona
The picture I posted, is the best looking and performing camber angle. FYI.
 

Ecoboost_xsport

SHO Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
3,944
Location
Sacramento, CA
So I'm gettin ready to take it in for another alignment. I think I'm going to go with a slightly more aggressive camber setup.

This is mostly for "spirited" street driving with the occasional stoplight "challenge".

Going to go with -2deg. I'm currently below the recommended settings at:

FL: -0.6deg
FR: -1.4deg
RL: -1.5deg
RR: -1.5deg

Question: front and rear identical or different setup for each?

OK, so to give me a bit more traction on the front wheels for those diigggggzzzz, I'll bring the front to -1 camber and keep the back at -2 camber, sound reasonable to start with?

What about toe, any recommendations? closest to zero as possible?
 

Kevin81

SHO Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Messages
666
Reaction score
540
Location
USA
OK, so to give me a bit more traction on the front wheels for those diigggggzzzz, I'll bring the front to -1 camber and keep the back at -2 camber, sound reasonable to start with?

What about toe, any recommendations? closest to zero as possible?
Toe in on the front gives you stability at high speeds, at the cost of increased tire wear. SCCA guys tend to run for in on the front, and a little toe out in the rears, but rear toe out is more for RWD cars.

Do you have any auto cross or SCCA groups active near you? Your particular car is tough, because its an SUV. Higher center of gravity, and heavier. More weight generally means increased adjustments.

Unless you plan on doing a lot of high speed driving (100+ mph), I'd say factory settings for toe, front and rear.

Question...when you turn the wheel all the way left or right, how much does you castor angle shift?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
107,087
Messages
1,181,313
Members
16,153
Latest member
lapochkarr

Members online

Back
Top