My point is open-wheel cars aren't generally designed the same as street cars with regards to suspension. Major automotive manufacturers have to make concessions with regards to making everything work together for the mass populace. F1 cars, et al don't have to worry about that. The suspensions are completely different, that's the point I was making. I think comparing an open-wheel racecar to a modified street car is completely unrelational due to suspension design. I can't really see comparing my Cobra to an F1 car, know what I mean?
So you're saying if you can design a better suspension with superior camber control you'd prefer a larger sidewall? I'd argue the opposite; when you've got sucky camber control you can help make up for it with a larger sidewall. To make a low-profile tire stay flat on the ground and get the best use of those stiff sidewalls and wide contact patches, you need a good camber curve on each corner. Most factory street-car suspensions, especially those with struts, don't do a great job of that.
My point of bringing up F1/open wheel is that even when you do have optimized camber curves you don't necessarily need or want a low-profile tire.
I think in this instance, he'd be better off with less sidewall flex.
Generally the reasons most folks go with 17" and larger rims for SHOs are:
1. Somebody told them that those short sidewalls handle better (which I contend is generally not true, and arguably not true for the SHO with it's McP strut suspension).
2. They like the looks better than a smaller rim.
3. They have a brake kit that precludes using anything smaller than 17".
4. The dearth of options for good, lightweight 16" rims with a 5x108 pattern and proper offset.
5. The availability of tire selections for the particular application.
The bottom line is that there are more options for 17" performance tires and wheels for the SHO than there are for 16". This drives a lot of people in that direction even for track cars, and it's a very practical consideration. Most of us ain't racin' these dudes for money, so the tradeoff of opening up options on tires and wheels is often worth it even if you take a performance hit by doing so.
Something not mentioned yet: a lower profile tire will reduce the ability to tweak handling via tire pressure changes. The amount of spring that you get from the tire goes down with the profile, and that reduces the adjustability to some degree.
I doubt that most people would notice much difference in performance on a SHO going between 16" and 17" rims, and depending on the relative tire selection I'm sure one could beat certain 16" tire/wheel combinations with other 17" tire/wheel combinations. I don't think it's correct to say generically that a lower profile tire improves handling because it just isn't so. There are other reasons to select larger rims, handling and acceleration are often not among them.