Today I had a local shop bend a 3" stainless steel pipe so that I could get a cone in the fender. I've been collecting the parts for several months, maf adapter, filter, etc. The last thing on my list was a grommet to mount the IAT in the tube, which I planned on getting later.
The fitment went quite well, not perfect, but very snug. We were able to do it without relocating the battery, we just had to adjust the angle of the MAF assy. a little bit. We left the IAT sensor outside the intake assy., as we didn't have what we needed to mount it.
The road test didn't go well.
For one, we didn't disconnect the battery initally, which we thought confused the computer a little bit. When I first started out, it seemed like there was minimal improvement. As the road test went on, the situation got worse. The car couldn't find it's idle and was stalling. Also we noticed a strong odor from the exhaust - she was running rich. When we brought it back to the shop we reset the computer and fired it back up. The idle got better, but it was still running rich. We plugged into the ODB and confirmed this.
Took it back out on the road and still no improvement. When we plugged in to the OBD system this time, we noticed the fuel values were normal at idle, but when the gas was stomped, they went off the charts (rich). It was then I decided to throw the stock airbox back on. We reset the battery, plugged into the OBD, and all was normal at idle, and at high RPMs. My trip home confirmed this, the car ran great!
After putting everything back together, the only conlusion we could draw was that the IAT was sitting in the open air of the engine compartment at 100+ degrees, while the intake air temperatures were in the nieghborhood of 70 or so. The tube itself was cool to the touch (which was encouraging), while the rest of the engine compartment was nice and toasty. This is the only factor (outside of the obvious increase of airflow) that we figured could have changed. I'm thinking we underestimated the role that the IAT sensor plays in the advance of timing on the V8 SHO. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks!
The fitment went quite well, not perfect, but very snug. We were able to do it without relocating the battery, we just had to adjust the angle of the MAF assy. a little bit. We left the IAT sensor outside the intake assy., as we didn't have what we needed to mount it.
The road test didn't go well.
For one, we didn't disconnect the battery initally, which we thought confused the computer a little bit. When I first started out, it seemed like there was minimal improvement. As the road test went on, the situation got worse. The car couldn't find it's idle and was stalling. Also we noticed a strong odor from the exhaust - she was running rich. When we brought it back to the shop we reset the computer and fired it back up. The idle got better, but it was still running rich. We plugged into the ODB and confirmed this.
Took it back out on the road and still no improvement. When we plugged in to the OBD system this time, we noticed the fuel values were normal at idle, but when the gas was stomped, they went off the charts (rich). It was then I decided to throw the stock airbox back on. We reset the battery, plugged into the OBD, and all was normal at idle, and at high RPMs. My trip home confirmed this, the car ran great!
After putting everything back together, the only conlusion we could draw was that the IAT was sitting in the open air of the engine compartment at 100+ degrees, while the intake air temperatures were in the nieghborhood of 70 or so. The tube itself was cool to the touch (which was encouraging), while the rest of the engine compartment was nice and toasty. This is the only factor (outside of the obvious increase of airflow) that we figured could have changed. I'm thinking we underestimated the role that the IAT sensor plays in the advance of timing on the V8 SHO. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks!