89 SHO
Well guys, I have fairly good brake pads, over 50% left, on all fours. Well after putting it to rest for a little and using the 93 SHO, I go back to it and the braking is a whole different story!
I have PFC pads on all 4's and a good flush with new HD Synthetic Valvoline Dot 4 fluid, on the 93. So, once I touch the brake pedal, it's quick to grab right away and come to a stop. Now, when I went to brake in the 89, it seems toooo mushy compared to the 93! So I just pretty much flushed the brake lines out until the fluid was clear again with, HD Synthetic Valvoline Dot 4. Thinking this would inhance the performance, I was totally wrong.
Same performance as before the flush. The fluid is at the correct level and all the bleeding zert thingy's are tighten proper, so I know there's no air in the lines.
Is there something wrong or does the difference have to be with the ATX/MTX and Non-ABS/ABS? shrug
BTW, the 89 also has PFC's up front and Albany's on the back.
So, any thoughts, opinions, reasonings, or replies are welcome!
Well guys, I have fairly good brake pads, over 50% left, on all fours. Well after putting it to rest for a little and using the 93 SHO, I go back to it and the braking is a whole different story!
I have PFC pads on all 4's and a good flush with new HD Synthetic Valvoline Dot 4 fluid, on the 93. So, once I touch the brake pedal, it's quick to grab right away and come to a stop. Now, when I went to brake in the 89, it seems toooo mushy compared to the 93! So I just pretty much flushed the brake lines out until the fluid was clear again with, HD Synthetic Valvoline Dot 4. Thinking this would inhance the performance, I was totally wrong.
Is there something wrong or does the difference have to be with the ATX/MTX and Non-ABS/ABS? shrug
BTW, the 89 also has PFC's up front and Albany's on the back.
So, any thoughts, opinions, reasonings, or replies are welcome!