92-95 ecu

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

chrism3784

SHO Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
577
Reaction score
87
Location
West Palm Beach, Florida
I hear you can use an ecu from a gen2 sho and will work plug and play in my 90 with better computer programming. Is true? Theres a nice 95 sho mtx in the junkyard waiting for the pickins!

If so, anyone know the better programming I could expect.
 

techi14

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
252
Reaction score
39
Location
Rockford, Ill
As far as I know, it does not add any performance gains, its mostly popular if you wanted to add a chip or lpm to it. But by itself its just not worth swapping over.
 

chrism3784

SHO Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
577
Reaction score
87
Location
West Palm Beach, Florida
Today cleaned out the entire intake, dissassembled, reassembled. Changed out all those little hoses with new ones from shosource. All fit great. Put new accel wireset on, the X2J computer from a 93 sho manual.

Started a little rough. Couldn't idle very well. Found out hard way can't use a different IAC. Cleaned old one from 90 and put in. Idle was still a little rough but smoothed out to perfect.

Drove it, what a difference!! Not so much in performance. Speedwise was abt the same. But smoothness a definite notice. I have digital dash and notice the gas milage at any point higher then with the 90 computer. I dont think cleaning out the manifold made that much a difference as what the ECU swap did. It controls the rpm much better, especially during shifts. Idles much better especially when slowing down, doesn't go up and down at all, stays smooth. Doesn't seem to stall as easily or drop rpm suddenly when accelerating normally. With 90 computer had to accel a little harsh to get it moving. Have a stage 1. When decelerating from say any speed all the way down to 35, instant mpg stays at 99mpg. Old 90 computer would give a number usually between 65mpg and 95 mpg. usually never at 99. Meaning its not putting fuel in the engine when your decelerating. Saves brakes and gas. An ecu swap to a X2J is definitely worth it in my opinion.

With all that positive comes the negative, my sho still does the same thing, cuts off every now and then. Mostly during heavy acceleration. Its so annoying!!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
4,970
Reaction score
1,456
Location
Cocoa,Florida
Today cleaned out the entire intake, dissassembled, reassembled. Changed out all those little hoses with new ones from shosource. All fit great. Put new accel wireset on, the X2J computer from a 93 sho manual.

Started a little rough. Couldn't idle very well. Found out hard way can't use a different IAC. Cleaned old one from 90 and put in. Idle was still a little rough but smoothed out to perfect.

Drove it, what a difference!! Not so much in performance. Speedwise was abt the same. But smoothness a definite notice. I have digital dash and notice the gas milage at any point higher then with the 90 computer. I dont think cleaning out the manifold made that much a difference as what the ECU swap did. It controls the rpm much better, especially during shifts. Idles much better especially when slowing down, doesn't go up and down at all, stays smooth. Doesn't seem to stall as easily or drop rpm suddenly when accelerating normally. With 90 computer had to accel a little harsh to get it moving. Have a stage 1. When decelerating from say any speed all the way down to 35, instant mpg stays at 99mpg. Old 90 computer would give a number usually between 65mpg and 95 mpg. usually never at 99. Meaning its not putting fuel in the engine when your decelerating. Saves brakes and gas. An ecu swap to a X2J is definitely worth it in my opinion.

With all that positive comes the negative, my sho still does the same thing, cuts off every now and then. Mostly during heavy acceleration. Its so annoying!!

BS:salute:
 

jelloslug

Digital
Joined
Aug 29, 2002
Messages
4,206
Reaction score
388
Location
Greenville, SC
Today cleaned out the entire intake, dissassembled, reassembled. Changed out all those little hoses with new ones from shosource. All fit great. Put new accel wireset on, the X2J computer from a 93 sho manual.

Started a little rough. Couldn't idle very well. Found out hard way can't use a different IAC. Cleaned old one from 90 and put in. Idle was still a little rough but smoothed out to perfect.

Drove it, what a difference!! Not so much in performance. Speedwise was abt the same. But smoothness a definite notice. I have digital dash and notice the gas milage at any point higher then with the 90 computer. I dont think cleaning out the manifold made that much a difference as what the ECU swap did. It controls the rpm much better, especially during shifts. Idles much better especially when slowing down, doesn't go up and down at all, stays smooth. Doesn't seem to stall as easily or drop rpm suddenly when accelerating normally. With 90 computer had to accel a little harsh to get it moving. Have a stage 1. When decelerating from say any speed all the way down to 35, instant mpg stays at 99mpg. Old 90 computer would give a number usually between 65mpg and 95 mpg. usually never at 99. Meaning its not putting fuel in the engine when your decelerating. Saves brakes and gas. An ecu swap to a X2J is definitely worth it in my opinion.

With all that positive comes the negative, my sho still does the same thing, cuts off every now and then. Mostly during heavy acceleration. Its so annoying!!

The ECU had nothing to do with that.
 

chrism3784

SHO Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
577
Reaction score
87
Location
West Palm Beach, Florida
I've been driving the that specific SHO with the same engine and ecu for almost 4 years. I know how it drove and what it felt like at any given situation. When I swapped the ecu, I definitely notice a difference. The car is not faster then it was, at least not noticably. But like someone told me, the numbers are definitely better and computer adjusts itself better. My last ecu had a hard time keeping a steady idle when I put aluminum flywheel and stage1 clutch on, and it wasn't the IAC, cause I'm using the same one as before. The intake wasn't very dirty anyways, don't think that made much difference.
 

zblackbeast

SHOtarded
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
2,632
Reaction score
374
Location
Omaha, NE
Its in your head.. im telling you.. the factory tune is exactly the same.. all I remember is its got a faster processor and easier to use lpm's and tuning programs
 

SHOspazz92

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
6,952
Reaction score
3,672
Location
Triad Area, North Carolina.
I've been driving the that specific SHO with the same engine and ecu for almost 4 years. I know how it drove and what it felt like at any given situation. When I swapped the ecu, I definitely notice a difference. The car is not faster then it was, at least not noticably. But like someone told me, the numbers are definitely better and computer adjusts itself better. My last ecu had a hard time keeping a steady idle when I put aluminum flywheel and stage1 clutch on, and it wasn't the IAC, cause I'm using the same one as before. The intake wasn't very dirty anyways, don't think that made much difference.

So swap back the old computer and see what happens.

-Sam
 

gmail

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
870
Reaction score
290
Location
sunbury pa
many have said it runs smoother... that much i believe.. as for anything else i doubt it..

but yes for anyone in the future you can use any MTX computer
 

shobote

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
207
Location
Naperville, IL
The previously poorer performance and hunting idle was likely a vac leak and cured by replacing the hoses. Shutting down at WOT....What MAF are you running, and have you cleaned your MAF filament ?
 

blk\blk90

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2002
Messages
589
Reaction score
230
Location
TX
92 should be fine. Just watch out for California ecus. They all have egr. And all atx ecus.
 

mavericksav

SHO Member
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
151
Reaction score
65
Location
Moscow
92 should be fine. Just watch out for California ecus. They all have egr. And all atx ecus.
I dont need 1992 ECU - I have it. It gives lot of incorrect Codes. So I'm back to 1991 ECU with 2 digit codes. And I haven't now EGR error. EGR is a bad idea for SHO
 

blk\blk90

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2002
Messages
589
Reaction score
230
Location
TX
Yeah, my 91+ has it. California car wound up it Texas. I'm gonna be searching for a new ecu, intake, and whatever else I need to delete it soon.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
107,080
Messages
1,181,220
Members
16,144
Latest member
14blkbeauty

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top