60k vs. 100k ?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

URLACHER54

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
166
Reaction score
4
Location
Gambrills, Maryland
a friend of mine was telling me that the atx 3.2 and the 3.0 mtx have different service requirements such as the 60k is for the mtx 3.0 and that the atx 3.2 does not have to be done until 100k, any one heard of this
 

ritmusic2k

wears a tux.
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Location
Garden Grove, CA
It's mentioned on the shotimes website...

DISCLAMER: My memory is not perfect, and this is from memory.

The MTX timing belt is listed as a 60k item. The ATX, however, uses a hydraulic timing belt tensioner unlike the MTX, and because of this timing belts last longer... therefore there is a 100k replacement schedule for ATX timing belts.

As far as the rest of the cars, remember that the intakes are essentially identical between the two; same valvetrain, same seals, same gaskets, etc.
Those are all upper 60k items, regardless of ATX/MTX setup. :thumb:

Anyone else chime in with addtitions/corrections!
 

URLACHER54

SHO Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
166
Reaction score
4
Location
Gambrills, Maryland
thanks thats what i thought but my friend is hard headed, but in his defense i did not know about the timing belt, but he cant use that against me we were talking about the 60k
 

1993MTXSHO

Its a Taurus...
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
4,720
Reaction score
330
Location
Jersey
the 60k is really to reseal everything up and make the timing perfect because the belt sometimes gets sloppy with age. Also adjusting the cams aka reshiming is a good idea. Honesty iv know 3.0L mtx shos to go to 100k with no trouble. It seems thought that by 60k the shos starts to leak and get a little sloppy and thats why the maintance is needed. If you want the engine to last, doing it every 60k will keep your car up on power and cant hurt it to do.
 

thecrew2999

3.2 MTX SHO
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
45
Location
Harrisburg/WilliamsportPA
actually what i learned is a mtx tends to wear faster cuz of shifting patterns and such where the atx has a smoother transition so the shims shouldnt wear as much... well that and mtx are so damn fun to drive you wanna hammer every gear :)
 

1993MTXSHO

Its a Taurus...
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
4,720
Reaction score
330
Location
Jersey
thecrew2999 said:
actually what i learned is a mtx tends to wear faster cuz of shifting patterns and such where the atx has a smoother transition so the shims shouldnt wear as much... well that and mtx are so damn fun to drive you wanna hammer every gear :)
that makes sense, atx engines are usually in better shape, every 3.2L iv taken apart has looked great as far as bearings and stuff goes as th 3.0L's looked like ****. Its probably like what you sad man people just don't wait on the atx's ad much as the mtx's. I know my car hits at leat 7k every times its out:biggrin:
 

ritmusic2k

wears a tux.
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Location
Garden Grove, CA
thecrew2999 said:
actually what i learned is a mtx tends to wear faster cuz of shifting patterns and such where the atx has a smoother transition so the shims shouldnt wear as much... well that and mtx are so damn fun to drive you wanna hammer every gear :)


Guilty as well :oops: That's why I'm rebuilding my 3.2 up from scratch for my swap. There is not a gasket/seal/component that isn't getting extreme attention/replacement. I know myself well enough to realize that if I was as zealous with the 3.0 as I was, then I will only be worse on the 3.2. She'd better be built to take it.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
107,080
Messages
1,181,220
Members
16,144
Latest member
14blkbeauty

Members online

Back
Top