revhardSHO
SHO Member
Clutch time...
I pulled the trans off the 90 titanium to find a rather interesting sight underneath. It seems as though the car is still on the original 9.25" clutch and PP. Doesnt make sense to me at all. The transmission was replaced (only the transmission, not the clutch) about 5k miles ago and shortly thereafter the clutch failed. Thats when I picked it up, so I dont have a history, all I know is the clutch disk is definitly toast. I can move it around inside the PP with one finger. It doesnt make sense that the stocker clutch would ever last this long. I recall my uncle mentioning that his failed @ 9K, and I have heard of others failing around that mileage. Im almost sure the car has 143K and not 43K. Typical wear for that mileage, and I have found alot of replacement parts all over the car, things that dont need replacing at 43k. Very Puzzling. Also, how can I identify what year the replacement trans was made in? The date code reads OK24.
Pics:
I pulled the trans off the 90 titanium to find a rather interesting sight underneath. It seems as though the car is still on the original 9.25" clutch and PP. Doesnt make sense to me at all. The transmission was replaced (only the transmission, not the clutch) about 5k miles ago and shortly thereafter the clutch failed. Thats when I picked it up, so I dont have a history, all I know is the clutch disk is definitly toast. I can move it around inside the PP with one finger. It doesnt make sense that the stocker clutch would ever last this long. I recall my uncle mentioning that his failed @ 9K, and I have heard of others failing around that mileage. Im almost sure the car has 143K and not 43K. Typical wear for that mileage, and I have found alot of replacement parts all over the car, things that dont need replacing at 43k. Very Puzzling. Also, how can I identify what year the replacement trans was made in? The date code reads OK24.
Pics:
.