S
Sleeper.Solutions86
Latest activity Postings About
-
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread The HP Tuners Misconception: Control vs Abstraction on the EcoBoost SHO.I never said it was a finish book or anything. If you want to be technical about the missing injector profiling the file I had (THE OS)...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 reacted to DadMobile's post in the thread The HP Tuners Misconception: Control vs Abstraction on the EcoBoost SHO with
Like.
Neither Sleeper nor Matt are tuning your car, how can they be a roadblock? It seems like you are the roadblock at this point. If you... -
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread Calibration Integrity of the 2010–2012 EcoBoost SHO HPTuners.Me big danger. AI guy said so. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 reacted to DadMobile's post in the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations with Like.
I’m no psychic but I sense something like “Update #600458, great success! Another zero waste gate pull in the books! The car did great...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 reacted to DadMobile's post in the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations with Like.
His ego won’t even let him see it.
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations.I’m giving this clown the answers to the test and he’s more interested studying the wrong subject. It’s great. Sent from my iPhone...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 reacted to DadMobile's post in the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations with Like.
It’s crazy how dumb this crackhead is. He doesn’t even realize that the torque limit isn’t the real issue.
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations.I’ve known your problems. Everyone has for over 6-8 months. You’re just now catching up. I mean it makes sense you are pretty slow. I’m...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations.Still can’t make a pass. Indeed, poor you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations.This keeps getting better and better. Keep digging that grave man. I honestly feel bad that Ryan has to deal with your ********. I...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations.Not being able to adjust the HPFP parameters means you have a loss of 20% minimum HPFP volume. You don’t even understand why I’m trying...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread 2010-12 Green Oak ECU vs 13+ TC-1797 (Tricore) ECU Differences and Hardware Limitations.Thank you for proving my point. HPFP not being adjusted because of missing parameters is 90% of your problems. Sent from my iPhone...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread The HP Tuners Misconception: Control vs Abstraction on the EcoBoost SHO.I also said you could have a PCM software update done on IDS at a local ford dealer. Read that new file that has the updated OS for your...
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 reacted to Majestic's post in the thread The HP Tuners Misconception: Control vs Abstraction on the EcoBoost SHO with Like.
Then what? You really think anyone is going to go back to the old ECU if they already have a newer one? Crazy talk.
-
SSleeper.Solutions86 replied to the thread The HP Tuners Misconception: Control vs Abstraction on the EcoBoost SHO.I think the whole point that has went over both of your heads. Is this has all started from Matt declining to to tune the car because...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
Latest posts
-
-
-
Rich backfire with Loss of Power- Latest: BaySHO Performance
-