zak
SHO Member
I would recommend a 3.0 ECU, it will work better with a manual transmission. The injectors in the 3.2 are just a tad larger and will compensate for the increased displacement. To my understanding there are only 7 wires that need to interconnect the existing car harness with the SHO ECU/engine harness.
Couple of other notes - the front (new left) exhaust manifold from the 3.2 SHO automatic engine tucks in closer the the block, might be important to help fit. If I remember right the rear (right) exhaust manifold from a 3.0 SHO tucks in tigter to the block.
Folks have made spacers, around a half inch thick, between the intake manifold and the heads, that allow the intake to rotate 180 degrees putting the throttlebody at the front.
One issue to research is the thermostat housing which ends up right next to the firewall. Don't recall a real clean solution for that issue.
Finally, the engine may interfere with your master cylinder especially the power brake booster (does your car have power brakes?) Consider the Ford Hydroboost system which using a fluid pump on the engine to replace the vacuum brake booster. It was used on some Lincoln models.
Couple of other notes - the front (new left) exhaust manifold from the 3.2 SHO automatic engine tucks in closer the the block, might be important to help fit. If I remember right the rear (right) exhaust manifold from a 3.0 SHO tucks in tigter to the block.
Folks have made spacers, around a half inch thick, between the intake manifold and the heads, that allow the intake to rotate 180 degrees putting the throttlebody at the front.
One issue to research is the thermostat housing which ends up right next to the firewall. Don't recall a real clean solution for that issue.
Finally, the engine may interfere with your master cylinder especially the power brake booster (does your car have power brakes?) Consider the Ford Hydroboost system which using a fluid pump on the engine to replace the vacuum brake booster. It was used on some Lincoln models.