Gearhead - upgraded!

[High on Ethanol]

Where do you get this number? Torque? SCT? Which PID?

Thanks!

Use the SCT software(livelink) to add it to your SCT configuration file or ask your tuner to do it.

 

[SHOthyme]

Use the SCT software(livelink) to add it to your SCT configuration file or ask your tuner to do it.

Which one is it? Does it just say #/min? The only one I saw was MAF, but I didn't think we had a MAF, it's a MAP... right?

 

[High on Ethanol]

Which one is it? Does it just say #/min? The only one I saw was MAF, but I didn't think we had a MAF, it's a MAP... right?

I think its called airflow

 

[GotGrip?]

I don't know, that seems a little light to me, with stock turbos and no GH IC on e30 with catted DP's and the rest of your mods (in a no-pp '18) I put 398 HP to the wheels. I would suspect with GH IC and turbos you should be well into the 400's.

Although, it was this spring with all that great cold dense air we have up nort.

I would agree with this, with FMIC, coils, intake and e30, I did 421/503 at the wheel. That was before any exhaust work and without a revision for the intercooler. With IC and Turbo upgrade i would imagine you should be deep in to the 400s if not into the 5s.

 

[FiveLeeter918]

I think its called airflow

yes it's "AIR FLOW #/min" but I wouldn't read too much into it on our cars. With all the nannies and the DI technology it's not as accurate as it was on previous cars.

I know on our Gen 1 F-150 Eco trucks, we make 540hp with turbo upgrades but only 53.29# air flow #/min.

Likewise, on our SHOs we have customers that made 370/390 (car downshifted on the dyno so it skewed torque down low) while only making 39 #/min mass air flow.

While it's a rule of thumb for comparative gains, I wouldn't take it to heart when figuring your actual power.

 

[High on Ethanol]

It all depends on conditions, fuel, other components, etc...

 

[SHOthyme]

yes it's "AIR FLOW #/min"

When I search for Air Flow in LiveLink, the only thing that comes up is under MAF, is that the correct one?

 

[FiveLeeter918]

When I search for Air Flow in LiveLink, the only thing that comes up is under MAF, is that the correct one?

yes, it's a calculated value so won't matter that we don't actually have a MAF sensor.

 

[High on Ethanol]

yes it's "AIR FLOW #/min" but I wouldn't read too much into it on our cars. With all the nannies and the DI technology it's not as accurate as it was on previous cars.

I know on our Gen 1 F-150 Eco trucks, we make 540hp with turbo upgrades but only 53.29# air flow #/min.

Likewise, on our SHOs we have customers that made 370/390 (car downshifted on the dyno so it skewed torque down low) while only making 39 #/min mass air flow.

While it's a rule of thumb for comparative gains, I wouldn't take it to heart when figuring your actual power.

Your post should reflect how accurate it is. Lol those numbers are ****** close.

 

[FiveLeeter918]

Your post should reflect how accurate it is. Lol those numbers are ****** close.

Well previous talk was that it reflected flywheel horsepower, but in our experience it's matching more closely to wheel horsepower since we are comparing to actual dyno numbers.

 

[High on Ethanol]

Well previous talk was that it reflected flywheel horsepower, but in our experience it's matching more closely to wheel horsepower since we are comparing to actual dyno numbers.

Dyno numbers are corrected and don't reflect actual power either.

Dynojet vs Mustang vs ???

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a13043642/why-you-shouldnt-trust-dyno-numbers/

 

[SM105K]

Best way to find the power your car is making is actually running a quarter mile. It takes X amount of HP to move X amount of weight at X amount of MPH.

 

[High on Ethanol]

Best way to find the power your car is making is actually running a quarter mile. It takes X amount of HP to move X amount of weight at X amount of MPH.

Yessir, this is by far your best post for information. Lmao

 

[FiveLeeter918]

Best way to find the power your car is making is actually running a quarter mile. It takes X amount of HP to move X amount of weight at X amount of MPH.

at the end of the day that's all that matters.

 

[SM105K]

Yessir, this is by far your best post for information. Lmao

Somehow Karen will show up and try to refute the actual science.

 

[High on Ethanol]

Somehow Karen will show up and try to refute the actual science.

I freaking hope so. Its so damn dead today. Although some cleaning ladies are here. Anticovid squad!

 

[GotGrip?]

Dyno numbers are corrected and don't reflect actual power either.

Dynojet vs Mustang vs ???

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a13043642/why-you-shouldnt-trust-dyno-numbers/

Shootout dyno is supposed to be the most accurate, that's what both of the AWD dyno guys around here use, commonly referred to as the "Heart-breaker dyno".

 

[stripSHO]

Different vehicle. E85 F150


I was getting around 57lbs on e30 with my sho with the bolt ons listed in sig.

I’m pretty sure 57 lb/min is well beyond the means of stock turbos. Even more so for 68 lb/min on the stock truck. Sounds like your speed density was/is way out of whack.

 

[High on Ethanol]

I’m pretty sure 57 lb/min is well beyond the means of stock turbos. Even more so for 68 lb/min on the stock truck. Sounds like your speed density was/is way out of whack.

https://www.f150online.com/articles/tuned-f-150-e85-sleeper/

 

[High on Ethanol]

I’m pretty sure 57 lb/min is well beyond the means of stock turbos. Even more so for 68 lb/min on the stock truck. Sounds like your speed density was/is way out of whack.

No idea. I was seeing around 48#/min on the SHO before any mods with just tune

 

[luigisho]

I freaking hope so. Its so damn dead today. Although some cleaning ladies are here. Anticovid squad!