G-Tech Pro SS #s

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Snug

New Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2004
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Location
Alaska
I ran the 94 ATX with CAI and new struts, full tank and me at 200lbs.

G-tech #s
0-60 - 7.2
1/4 - 15.2 @ 91.5
HP 156 @ 4800
TQ 190 @ 4500

Do those #s sound accurate? This was my first time running the car in 4 years, but I had to try it:dribble:

Thanks,
Doug
 

Team Dave

SHO n00b
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
160
Reaction score
151
Location
Sacramento, CA
0-60 looks about right. The 1/4 and trap look about right too. How was the run? Bog much?

HP looks low though IMO. Although I wouldn't expect a G-Tech to be horribly accurate there anyway.
 

hawkeye18

Sorta cares
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
5,631
Reaction score
2,727
Location
Norfolk, VA
a 7.2s 0-60 and a 15.2 1/4 don't really match up. 15.2 does sound a little fast, but if it really did run a 15.2, it didn't take 7.2 seconds to get to 60...

And I agree, HP is a little low.

G-techs are a sad, sad, sad substitute for a proper dyno.
 

AREA 91

PA SHO SHOP
Joined
Jul 17, 2002
Messages
5,349
Reaction score
1,003
Location
Area 91
Just go to the drags.

A time slip dosen't lie.

Back in the day when I played with the first generation G Tec, it was pretty accureate execpt fthe 1/4 mile time was about 3 tenth's faster then what the car actually ran at the strip.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
107,080
Messages
1,181,219
Members
16,144
Latest member
14blkbeauty

Members online

Back
Top