SHO pickup

[TornadoHands]

Again, I'm just the messenger...

"Custom built - SHO Pickup. Moon-roof, PS,Power mirrors, and Locks. Has bed cover, rebuilt title, Dark Green with Gray interior."


Price: $7,500

Harry's Toy Barn
785-534-1967
BELOIT, KS

https://www.autabuy.com/details/?VID=37835690&utm_source=Trovit&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=Premium

 

[SHOMON]

Love it!! Although the ad says Automatic transmission when it is clearly a MTX.
Also no mileage listed.

 

[SM105K]

I dont know how to feel about this..

 

[luigisho]

Good find. I haven't seen that one in a long long time!

 

[luigisho]

I dont know how to feel about this..

C'mon a SHOchero. What's not to like?

 

[zoomlater]

Wasn't there a magazine article on this car as well

 

[luigisho]

It's been in a few places like Jalopnik and here:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/articles/pro-ute-conversion-ford-taurus-sho-ranchero/

https://news.pickuptrucks.com/2012/01/customized-89-taurus-becomes-sho-ranchero.html

 

[yaycandy]

I dont know how to feel about this..

I was thinking the official SHO Ranger when i clicked, not an actual converted SHO

 

[zoomlater]

I've never seen that 89 version before

 

[Irish Pride]

All that custom work and it's got a stock Y pipe on it....

 

[RonPorter]

This thing just won't go away! Never liked it. The Ranger bed is too damn small, and it just looks bad. Shoulda sectioned in an F150 bed that would fit better.

 

[bpd1151]

This thing just won't go away!

LOL @ RP exclaiming that this thing just won't go away.

Haha.

I can actually envision Ron screaming that very sentiment outloud too!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

[PaulTAutoX]

It's been in a few places like Jalopnik and here:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/articles/pro-ute-conversion-ford-taurus-sho-ranchero/

https://news.pickuptrucks.com/2012/01/customized-89-taurus-becomes-sho-ranchero.html

I have to say that the body on the Gen II back end is nicely done. The bed side-step is a nice touch, I'd want one of those even if it was a larger truck bed. Or especially. The smaller width is more of a step-side or even stake-bed look, I wouldn't have thought to do it that way and would have liked a larger bed.

All that said, a Flex would be a better platform. The loss of the unit body would probably give the Taurus too much flex, no pun intended, unless you added in some sort of frame rail structure.

 

[Shaggy]

Some people have waaaaay to much time and money on there hands...