Hoping for better flow distribution across all cylinders. I think shortening the first two trumpets assist better with air distribution in the intake plenum. The intake charge is at a high velocity going into the intake plenum and while the increase in cross-section area will slow the air down and increase pressure, the first thing the air has to do is negotiate a 90 degree turn and slams into the first two trumpets. I could imagine the potential for turbulence.
The first two trumpets always have more than enough air provided by the plenum entree, it’s the rear cylinders that really suffer and lack air flow. Usually the front cylinders run lean and the back run rich.
The idea is with the first two runners cut down closer to the floor of the manifold we can open up the flow at the entree and allow the air to skip over the first two trumpets and feed the rear cylinders better. Also reducing the intake length will increase peak power by a touch on those two cylinder(or move the power in those cylinders) but will also reduce velocity. Velocity loss isn’t a problem though as the air is already moving fast at that point. So were looking at overall tradeoff and fair trade across all cylinders.
I don’t know if anybody noticed but one of the stock trumpet sets has a longer trumpet at the very end.
Trumpet on the far left:

So, with multiply stepped runners we could maybe expect to broaden the torque curve at the expense of maybe 1-2 peak hp. But the 1-2 hp peak loss maybe worth the overall gain of say 5-10 hp from all the modifications.
To recap:
Improved air distribution
Reduced turbulence
This is my “Hope”
Also, it would be very easy to modify trumpet sets in many ways. One could reduce all runners by .75 inch and move peak hp up 500-800 rpm? It would be really easy to start dropping different sets in on the dyno. One could make pulls with the new set every 10 min.