0-60 in 4.175ish seconds

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
Yup, measured today on the SCTx4 device running the LMS 4+X Race Tune on 93 pump only.. super stoked about that time! I don't really care if anyone else cares, just thought I would share.

Based on that 0-60 and my 0-90 times that should put me close to a lowish 12 second 1/4 I would think.

I really need to get to the track to validate my times on the datalogs LOL...
 

Usmcsho01

Active Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
139
Reaction score
202
4.1?! What mods do u have?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

yo tony

SHO Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
348
Reaction score
232
Location
Manning, SC
Gotta be better than the crappy rsa i have on mine lol. I'm about to order some f1 supercars. They are super cheap right now and we don't have a winter in sc
 

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
Nah not much of one down there, but you do get some ice storms occasionally lol... I hate RSA.... Never had a good set...and for awhile they were OEM on everything..
 
Last edited:

brucelinc

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
674
Reaction score
845
Location
Minnesota
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php

I don't think a 4.175 0-60 equates to a low 12 second quarter mile ET. I have found the Wallace calculator to be quite accurate. It bases 0-60 on 1/8 mile times and speed. Typically, a low 12 ET produces a 0-60 in the 3.7-3.9 range.

I am not criticizing the the 4.175 time. A low 4 second 0-60 is very good but low 12s are pretty hard to come by.
 

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php

I don't think a 4.175 0-60 equates to a low 12 second quarter mile ET. I have found the Wallace calculator to be quite accurate. It bases 0-60 on 1/8 mile times and speed. Typically, a low 12 ET produces a 0-60 in the 3.7-3.9 range.

I am not criticizing the the 4.175 time. A low 4 second 0-60 is very good but low 12s are pretty hard to come by.
I agree that it's a stretch, but clubsfit posted his datalog and ran a 4.1 second 0-60 on his 11.9 run and his low 12's... Not saying I would run those times by any means, also Rich runs low 12's and im sure his 0-60 times are around those low 4's..

Just saying the potential is there I believe for my car to run a sub 12.4 second 1/4 mile...

Of course you put down 3.9 second 0-60, not sure what your 1/4 times are..
 

brucelinc

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
674
Reaction score
845
Location
Minnesota
Rich has 0-60 in the 3.7 range according to the Wallace Calculator if I recall correctly. I base my 0-60 on the Aeroforce gauge and the Wallace Calculator. They show nearly identical times. The 3.94 that I have listed is based on a 1/8 mile result of 8.16 @ 86.38. Rich's car is much faster than mine.

Again, you might have a low 12 second car. You might also have a better 0-60 time than 4.175. Has the SCT device proven to be very accurate?
 

StealBlueSho

SHO Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
2,431
Location
NA
Mine says 3.55 on My best run. Not sure I'm that fast
I dump the raw CSV and then compare the time stamps to the MPH and do the math... Then resolution is like .02 seconds or better... The digital read out is not accurate..
 
Back
Top